Chesterfield Hotel vs Similar Hotels

Comments indicate that rooms were old and in need of maintenance.

Functional and practical: rooms offer fridges, kettles and kitchenettes in some units and good beds; negatives include small showers, a bland/hospital-like bathroom in some rooms and inconsistent room conditions.

Mentioned issues regarding size, comfort and overall condition of the rooms.

Some rooms reported issues such as dust and basic furnishings, though some reviews were positive about comfort.

Several mentions of cleanliness issues, including mold and dust.

Mixed but leaning negative: several guests report dirty floors, sticky elevator/ground floor, dusty surfaces, mold in vents and poor room cleaning; some guests did note rooms that were clean and tidy.

Multiple mentions of cleanliness issues and lack of proper maintenance.

Multiple reviews mention issues with cleanliness, including dust and dirt on the floors.

Positive comments regarding the good location, close to amenities and attractions.

Consistently very positive: central, convenient for shops, restaurants and sights; easy to find and practical for families, though a few rooms face unattractive back rooftops.

Frequently highlighted as a strong point for its central placement.

Good location nearby transportation; slightly impacted by construction nearby.

Many reviewers praised the friendly and helpful staff, with good service noted frequently.

Generally praised: many mentions of helpful, friendly staff and 24/7 reception with easy check-in; isolated reports of rude receptionists reduce the score slightly.

Consistently praised as kind and helpful by multiple reviewers.

Positive mentions of friendly and helpful staff, offsetting isolated issues.

Food quality was criticized, especially breakfast service.

Not widely discussed beyond in-room kettle/coffee; no consistent comments about breakfast or on-site F&B, so assigned standard/target rating.

Breakfast received positive remarks, though some wished for better hygiene.

Frequent complaints about the quality and variety of breakfast options.

Amenities received mixed reviews, with some noting sufficient offerings while others pointed out deficiencies.

Basic but adequate: in-room kettles, coffee/tea and fridges reported; shortcomings include limited cutlery/glasses, few power outlets and occasional lack of toilet paper.

Basic amenities are present but lack of additional comfort and utilities noted.

Limited facilities mentioned; expectations were not met in several instances.

Generally seen as affordable, but quality issues raised concerns with value.

Mixed: positioned as budget accommodation and centrally located (a plus), but recurring cleanliness problems, parking costs/issues and inconsistent room quality mean perceived value is somewhat below average.

Considered reasonable for the services provided despite some drawbacks.

Generally considered reasonable for the price, with some reviews suggesting value was adequate.