Kyriad Bordeaux - Merignac Aéroport vs Similar Hotels

General comfort noted, but there are comments about issues like a cold shower and uncomfortable beds.

Mixed room comments: comfortable beds and good shower/AC reported, but some rooms have small surface area and bathrooms in poor condition (swollen doors, worn fixtures).

Rooms are sometimes comfortable and modern, but recurring complaints about noisy or ineffective air conditioning, poor soundproofing, occasional uncomfortable mattresses and humidity/odour issues.

Some complaints about room size and maintenance issues reported.

Several reviews mention cleanliness issues, such as mold in the shower and dirty towels.

Multiple reviews report poor cleaning: stained carpets, blood on sheets, insects/cockroaches, sewer smells and badly maintained bathrooms; some guests did report clean rooms, but negatives dominate.

Mixed cleanliness: several guests praised clean rooms, but multiple reports of dirty bathrooms, mould in showers and having to change rooms due to unclean facilities lower the score.

Multiple reviews highlight cleanliness positively, but some issues reported.

Frequent mentions of the hotel's convenient proximity to the airport and public transport.

Very strong location feedback: close to airport, tram stop in front of hotel and easy access to city center and restaurants; repeatedly cited as a major positive.

Consistently positive: repeatedly noted as very near the airport, close to the tram to Bordeaux centre and nearby restaurants/supermarket, making it convenient for transfers.

Highlighted as convenient for airport access and transport links.

Consistent praise for friendly and helpful staff across multiple reviews.

Consistently praised staff: multiple mentions of friendly, welcoming reception and helpful service, including flexible cancellation handling.

Service is mixed: some staff described as friendly and desk usually staffed, but several mentions of unhelpful receptionists, issue with change for tourist tax and slow/limited responsiveness.

Consistently positive feedback regarding helpfulness and availability of staff.

Breakfast praised by some, while others found it too expensive.

Breakfast and F&B are inconsistent: some guests enjoyed a very good buffet, but several report weak/poorly replenished breakfasts and the restaurant/bar being closed or unavailable at times.

Breakfast is the main negative F&B point: several guests found it limited, lacking variety (few fruits, few viennoiseries, no eggs) and considered somewhat expensive for what is offered.

Breakfast received praise but some issues with restaurant availability.

Facilities were adequate, though the breakfast price received negative feedback.

Amenities generally functional: terrace and restaurant available, tram access; however restaurant/bar availability and some daily supplies (breakfast replenishment) were inconsistent.

Basic amenities: secure parking praised and rooms have AC (though noisy), but issues reported with non-smart TV, missing soap, limited breakfast options and occasional cleanliness of shower cabins.

Comments about limited offerings and outdated facilities.

Value perceived as average; breakfast costs deemed too high by some guests.

Mixed perceptions: several guests praise good value and consistent pricing, while others note occasional unexplained price increases and extra fees at check-in.

Generally seen as good value by multiple reviewers (explicit 'bon rapport qualité/prix'), especially for an overnight/transfer stay, despite some extras (breakfast) being seen as pricey.

Generally perceived as good value, especially considering location.