Preskil Island Resort vs Similar Hotels

Rooms were described as spacious and modern, but some aspects like cleanliness need improvement.

While the rooms were generally good, some felt that the quality did not meet expectations due to incomplete renovations.

Mixed sentiments regarding the room quality, with some concerns about outdated facilities and noise.

Many guests mention spacious, recently renovated rooms and comfortable beds, though occasional comments about a lumpy/tired bed and minor maintenance needs.

Issues with cleanliness were explicitly mentioned, including excrement in facilities.

Some reviews indicate that renovations were not thorough, leading to issues with cleanliness in bathrooms.

Several reviews indicated issues with cleanliness, particularly with dampness and poor room upkeep.

Generally clean property noted by multiple guests, but isolated issues reported (dirty main pool by one reviewer, bathroom sink not clean and dusty air vent) that slightly lower this score.

The location was praised as beautiful and ideally situated.

The hotel's surroundings and proximity to the beach were highlighted as beautiful.

Many reviews highlighted the prime location close to the beach and airport as a significant plus.

Excellent location and grounds: quiet bay, great beaches, good views and plane-spotting; well regarded by many guests.

Service was generally good but could be inconsistent at times.

Guests praised the service as excellent and very accommodating, especially with special requests.

Most guests expressed that the staff was friendly and professional, contributing positively to the experience.

Consistently praised staff: friendly, helpful housekeepers (Raj), attentive team members (Girish, Renna, Nanda, Sebastien), management resolved issues — strong service sentiment throughout reviews.

Quality of food reported as variable, but some positive comments about variety at meals.

Many guests enjoyed the food, although some meals were reported to be cold.

Guests expressed dissatisfaction with the buffet options and quality, feeling limited and lackluster.

Food widely praised as exceptional and varied by many guests; some negative notes about reduced choices, longer waits since shift to à la minute service and one comment about printed menu access.

Amenities were decent, but certain shortcomings were noted, like limited food options.

The hotel offered many activities, though some guests mentioned limited night activities.

Amenities received varying feedback with some enjoyment noted but also critiques regarding the buffet.

Strong amenities offering (spa treatments, large gym, golf, padel, tennis, motorised water sports, water sports club) frequently praised; some calls for building maintenance/upgrades.

Mixed sentiments about pricing relative to the offerings.

Some guests felt the experience did not justify the high price, expecting more luxury.

Concerns were raised about the cost being high for the services and quality provided.

Generally positive but mixed: high-quality food/activities and special gestures (anniversary champagne) vs complaints about unexpected paid transport and changing restaurant format reducing perceived value.