Welcomotel Beauvais Aéroport vs Similar Hotels

Room size was mentioned as small and there were issues with temperature control.

Several issues reported: lack of air conditioning (rooms very warm), broken shutters/blinds, uncomfortable mattresses for some, worn decor and occasional plumbing problems.

Rooms were described as spacious, though some noted aging or finishing issues.

Mixed reviews on room quality, with mentions of old furniture and comfort issues.

Some complaints about cleanliness and maintenance issues in the bathroom.

Mixed: some guests report clean rooms while others note dirty exterior stairs, grey/rough towels and a worn carpet; cleanliness is inconsistent.

Some reviews mention cleanliness issues with carpets and the overall aging of the hotel.

Multiple reviews indicate cleanliness issues, including dirty rooms and unclean shower facilities.

Generally good location, although some guests noted distance from the airport.

Good for airport stops and shopping/fast-food access; convenient for transfers but located in a commercial, non-touristic zone and sometimes hard to find.

Convenient for travelers but some mentioned being in an industrial area.

Location is convenient for airport access, although some found it a bit far.

Overall positive remarks on staff friendliness and service quality.

Generally very positive: multiple mentions of friendly, warm and helpful reception staff and good welcome.

Many guests praised the friendliness and helpfulness of the staff.

Generally positive experiences with service, highlighted by friendly staff.

Breakfast options were limited and not up to expectations.

Breakfast generally described as varied and copious, though some guests mention limited choices and hygiene issues due to other guests' behavior.

Positively reviewed for meals, but noted limited availability of restaurant services.

Breakfast received positive feedback, contributing to the overall experience.

Basic amenities; some guests suggested improvements.

Useful amenities like closed parking and electric car chargers praised; limited in-room comforts (no AC, small fan) and reduced welcome toiletries reported.

Good facilities were mentioned, but limited operation of the restaurant affected the score.

Amenities require improvement, with comments on missing elevators and broken items.

Good value for the quality of services provided.

Frequently noted as good value for the price, with comfortable beds and satisfactory overall for short stays.

Generally perceived as fair value for services provided.

Good value based on low price and included services, despite other shortcomings.