Hotel Reutemann-Seegarten vs Similar Hotels

Some negative mentions: dated room inventory, separated-room assignment issues, toilets not separated and bathtub instead of shower in at least one review.

Rooms are described as comfortable and well-appointed, though some updates are needed.

Rooms were described as nice but with some concerns about space for luggage.

Rooms/apartments described as tastefully furnished, comfortable beds, well equipped and clean — guests report very comfortable stays.

Multiple reviews explicitly praise cleanliness of rooms, bathrooms and pools; guests describe rooms and pools as very clean.

General cleanliness was noted positively across reviews, but some areas need improvement.

Some reviews mentioned cleanliness issues, particularly with the toilet seat.

Multiple reviews explicitly state rooms and apartments were very clean and well maintained.

Consistently highlighted as exceptional: fronting the harbour/lake with magnificent views and convenient proximity to the promenade and train station.

The central location near the lake and transport options was frequently highlighted.

Repeated praise for the prime location near the lake and city attractions.

Consistently praised: direct waterfront/hafen location, excellent views over the lake and harbour, very central and close to the train station.

Staff repeatedly described as attentive, friendly and helpful (including assistance with luggage and parking); one isolated complaint about having to pay to be moved to adjacent rooms.

Staff was consistently praised for being friendly and accommodating.

Staff was generally friendly, though some reviews mentioned varying service quality.

Staff repeatedly described as friendly, flexible and responsive; hosts provide clear self check-in instructions though reception is only temporarily staffed at times.

Breakfast is frequently described as excellent, varied and high-quality; minor comment about lower-quality cold cuts in one review.

Breakfast received high marks but some felt pricing was steep for other options.

Breakfast received high praises, exceeding expectations.

Breakfast/lobby/food offerings are absent or limited according to reviews, leading to a slightly lower score despite overall positive accommodation.

Pools, terrace for breakfast and nearby parking are repeatedly praised and considered strong hotel assets.

Facilities like the pool and spa received mixed reviews, with suggestions for improvement.

No significant issues mentioned, but highlighted missing kettle.

Apartments are well equipped and include useful extras (dedicated parking available for a fee); minor negatives noted such as no elevator, some missing small kitchen items (paper towels, sponge) and no lobby.

Generally good value for breakfast and location, but negatives include a €35/day dog fee and an instance of paying extra to secure adjacent rooms, lowering perceived value.

Some reviews indicated that the pricing is on the higher side compared to amenities.

Feedback indicates some concerns about costs not being clearly communicated.

Several guests mention the price is high for what is offered (especially in cooler months when terraces can’t be used); paid parking and lack of breakfast/lobby reduce perceived value.