All Suites Appart Hôtel - Bordeaux - Mérignac Aéroport vs Similar Hotels

Rooms described as old, worn/vétuste, poorly maintained with broken equipment (fridge freezer door missing, equipment broken), bad odors and poor insulation; comfort is often lacking (too hot, no AC).

Mixed reports: some comfortable rooms and renovated bathrooms, but others with aging bathrooms, curtains that don’t block light, AC failures and missing/fractured fridge parts — slightly below average.

Mixed room comments: comfortable beds and good shower/AC reported, but some rooms have small surface area and bathrooms in poor condition (swollen doors, worn fixtures).

Rooms were comfortable but had some complaints about noise and bed types.

Repeated complaints about very dirty rooms, stained walls/curtains, dirty sink/siphon, unclean microwave and floors, spider webs and lack of adequate cleaning; cleanliness is a major negative.

Multiple reviews report dirty rooms, stained bedding, dusty/greasy walls and skirting, unclean fridge/microwave and general lack of upkeep — clear negative on cleanliness.

Multiple reviews report poor cleaning: stained carpets, blood on sheets, insects/cockroaches, sewer smells and badly maintained bathrooms; some guests did report clean rooms, but negatives dominate.

Hotel was reported as clean and well-maintained.

Frequently cited as a prime positive: proximity to the airport and convenient placement; many guests highlight the advantageous location and tranquility.

Good practical location (near airport, tram stop, and secure parking) but situated in an industrial/polígono area that is unattractive for walking — mixed-to-good.

Very strong location feedback: close to airport, tram stop in front of hotel and easy access to city center and restaurants; repeatedly cited as a major positive.

The hotel is conveniently located near the airport.

Multiple comments praise staff as very welcoming, attentive and helpful (changed rooms when needed, lent a fan, courteous reception); a few notes of indifferent reactions, but overall service is consistently strong.

Staff repeatedly described as friendly, helpful and attentive (calls to confirm arrival, multilingual reception, welcoming personnel) — strong positive experience with service.

Consistently praised staff: multiple mentions of friendly, welcoming reception and helpful service, including flexible cancellation handling.

Staff was friendly and helpful according to multiple reviews.

Not mentioned in reviews; assigned the target overall rating.

Breakfast and F&B receive mixed feedback — some availability but issues noted (late opening, unpleasant taste in dishes/bread, limited bar offerings) leading to a modest score.

Breakfast and F&B are inconsistent: some guests enjoyed a very good buffet, but several report weak/poorly replenished breakfasts and the restaurant/bar being closed or unavailable at times.

Breakfast was well-received but some items were reportedly lacking.

Notable lack of amenities: absence of air conditioning in many rooms, missing or broken kitchen items, minimal housekeeping and few comforts; guests frequently requested but lacked fans/AC.

Pool and secure parking are frequently praised; basic amenities generally present though some problems reported (AC breakdown, limited coffee machine availability, breakfast timing/issues). Overall amenities are a strong point.

Amenities generally functional: terrace and restaurant available, tram access; however restaurant/bar availability and some daily supplies (breakfast replenishment) were inconsistent.

Basic amenities available but some guests noted a lack of certain facilities.

Mixed signals but several guests explicitly mention good price-to-quality and appreciated the friendly staff, so perceived value is relatively strong despite issues with room condition (score adjusted up to balance overall average).

Several reviewers explicitly mention good value / good price-quality ratio despite some shortcomings — overall perceived as good value.

Mixed perceptions: several guests praise good value and consistent pricing, while others note occasional unexplained price increases and extra fees at check-in.

Guests found the hotel to have a good price-to-quality ratio.