LSA Campos by Numa vs Similar Hotels

Comfortable beds and well-equipped apartments cited often; a few guests reported issues (hard beds for some, damaged floor, shower head problems, bathroom splash without proper screen).

Several negative remarks: old or broken furniture (broken cupboard door), dated kitchen, poor lighting, noisy parquet and hard mattresses; a few guests did note modern/up-to-date apartments.

Some rooms were reported as small and poorly maintained, yet comfort was generally acceptable.

Rooms were generally comfortable, though there were some maintenance complaints.

Mixed reports: many guests praise good cleaning and cleanliness of rooms, but several reviews note inconsistent or just-sufficient cleaning and occasional dirty floors.

Mixed feedback: many guests reported the apartments as clean, but several noted worn/dirty coverings, old kitchen fixtures and specific cleanliness issues (e.g., room 105) that lowered impressions.

Multiple reviews mentioned issues with cleanliness, including dirty bathrooms and poor maintenance.

Some comments on cleanliness mentioned good hygiene, but there were also remarks about maintenance issues.

Widely praised: near metro/bus, supermarkets and restaurants; convenient parking for many. Some notes about being farther from the city center but easy/cheap by ride-share.

Consistently praised as an excellent/very good location by many guests; a minority noted it can be a long walk (~1 hour) to the city centre.

Consistently praised for its great location near metro and central attractions.

Location praised for safety and proximity to restaurants, contributing positively to the stay.

Generally friendly and helpful staff with convenient code-based self check-in for many; however some guests experienced slow responses (e.g., late toilet paper replacement, long wait for check-in/help).

Generally positive: staff described as pleasant and responsive (quick email replies) with daily cleaning service; some friction due to a slow/buggy online check-in process and ID upload requirements.

Positive remarks about cordial staff ready to assist.

Overall, staff showed friendliness and helpfulness, with a few exceptions during evening shifts.

Very little F&B on offer; one specific complaint about a monotone, uninspired breakfast offering and limited attention to breakfast service.

Positive: breakfast described several times as very good / delicious and a buffet option was appreciated.

Not explicitly mentioned, but the presence of tea and snacks adds value.

Food quality was criticized for being low and lacking variety, impacting breakfast experience.

Good amenities mentioned (kitchen, air conditioning) but occasional failures reported: TV/internet outages, broken handheld shower, and lack of cleaning tools for spills.

Well equipped: guests mention washer, dishwasher, microwave and sufficient cooking utensils; parking available (paid) and luggage lockers exist but may incur extra fees.

The availability of refreshments like cookies and tea was noted positively.

Amenities received criticism for multiple malfunctions, including pool issues and sauna complaints.

Perceived as good value by many guests (convenient location, parking options, functional apartments) despite a few service/maintenance issues.

Mixed perception: good value for location and cleanliness for some visitors, but extra charges (parking, lockers), dated furnishings and occasional quality issues reduce perceived value for others.

Mixed reviews on value, with some feeling apartments did not meet their expectations based on the pricing.

Value perceived as fair, but issues with maintenance might affect overall satisfaction.