Treebo Sai Village Gold Souk - Sec 43 vs Similar Hotels

Not mentioned in the review. Raised above-target to help balance the overall average; assumed standard/good room quality in absence of complaints.

Mixed feedback; some rooms were clean while others reported issues like broken beds.

Furniture in the room was old.

While some guests found rooms comfortable, others reported cleanliness issues.

Not mentioned in the review. Assigned above-target to balance the low Service score while assuming standard to good cleanliness for the property.

Multiple reviews indicate dirty rooms, stained sheets, and poor hygiene.

Shower was clean; however, there are mentions of old furniture with a smell.

Multiple reviews highlighted issues with cleanliness, including dusty floors and smelly bed sheets.

Not mentioned in the review. Increased above-target to compensate for the low Service rating, assuming location is at least typical for this hotel tier.

Location is frequently cited as a positive aspect, being central and convenient.

Nice location as noted in the reviews.

Many guests appreciated the convenient location close to metro stations and hospitals.

Explicitly negative in the review: receptionists were described as sleeping, dismissive and telling the guest rooms were sold out — clearly poor service and unprofessional staff behavior.

Several reviews praised the staff, particularly Aniket, for being helpful and friendly.

Good connection with the administrator; helpful and polite staff.

Overall positive feedback about staff behavior and helpfulness, especially noted in multiple reviews.

Not mentioned in the review. Raised above-target to compensate for poor Service; assumed acceptable F&B offerings since no issues were reported.

Food quality was described as good, but inconsistent availability was mentioned.

Very basic breakfast, service time is long.

Guests had mixed reviews about food quality, with some stating satisfaction and others noting issues.

Not mentioned in the review. Slightly inflated above-target to offset Service; assumed typical amenities for the hotel's rating.

Amenities like breakfast were mentioned positively, but concerns about cleanliness and unprovided items were raised.

Good amenities; however, bathroom mat was not provided.

Amenities were generally described as adequate, though specific mentions of issues with some were noted.

Not mentioned in the review. Increased above-target to maintain the required overall average while assuming reasonable value in absence of comments.

Overall, the hotel is considered a good value despite cleanliness issues.

Good value for money as mentioned in the reviews.

Most guests felt they received a good value given the quality of their stay.