BKK39 Airport Hotel vs Similar Hotels

Rooms described as old, not as pictured, with broken furniture, door gaps letting insects in, noisy and with malfunctioning AC and occasional lock/elevator issues.

Rooms described as old/antiquated, worn fixtures, broken tiles and outdated bathrooms; some comfortable beds noted but overall in need of renovation.

Spacious and comfortable rooms were highlighted.

Rooms were described as clean but with issues like noise and poor soundproofing.

Multiple reviews report serious cleanliness issues: red ants in bathroom, filthy ashtray, moldy/cakey air-con, sewage smell and general dirtiness.

Frequent reports of mould, cockroaches, dirty tiles, bad odour and general lack of cleanliness; several guests described rooms as 'disgusting' or in need of deep cleaning.

The room cleanliness was lacking as per some reviews.

Some reviews mentioned cleanliness positively, but concerns about insects and room quality were noted.

Consistently noted as close to the airport, near shops and a hospital — convenient for transit, though some mention main-road noise.

Very close to the international airport (positive for transit guests) but repeatedly described as in an industrial/unsafe area, distant from restaurants, with narrow or poor access roads — mixed but airport proximity is a clear plus.

Well-located for airport access, though some found it isolated.

Many reviews expressed disappointment with the location being isolated and close to the airport.

Staff described as apologetic, friendly and helpful; reception tried to resolve problems and offered refunds/transfers and free airport shuttle in several reports.

Mostly praised: many guests described staff as friendly, humble and helpful with airport transfers; a few reports of indifferent or rude behaviour but the majority comments were positive, justifying a strong service score.

Staff were mentioned as friendly and helpful.

Multiple reviews highlighted the friendly and helpful staff.

Breakfast received positive mention in at least one review; no other consistent F&B offerings discussed.

Mixed but generally acceptable: some guests praised the restaurant, others noted breakfast format could improve; overall decent for an airport hotel.

Breakfast options were considered limited and could be improved.

Reviews mentioned the breakfast as good, but some described it as limited.

Breakfast praised in one review and airport shuttle available; otherwise limited or basic amenities reported (no strong positives beyond shuttle/breakfast).

Has an airport shuttle (sometimes charged), small pool, on-site restaurant; lacks a gym and several guests noted tiny or insignificant lobby/pool — adequate for short stays but limited amenities.

The pool area received positive comments, enhancing the overall stay.

General satisfaction with amenities was noted, though specific items weren't mentioned in positive light.

Mixed — marketed as budget/transit option (near airport, low price) but poor cleanliness/room condition reduced perceived value for several guests.

Frequently described as cheap and a sensible option for an overnight stay near the airport; good value for short transit stays despite shortcomings.

Guests felt they received a good value for the price paid.

Positive remarks about cost-effectiveness, especially for transit stays.