Quality Hotel Richard With vs Similar Hotels

Rooms are described as very pleasant and spacious.

Rooms often described as comfortable and spacious but mixed issues: narrow steep stairs, sparse fittings in some units, missing sockets and occasional dated/underfloor rooms.

The facilities and cleanliness were praised in several reviews.

Multiple reviews report poor hygiene: dirty kitchen/dishes, unclean bathrooms and walls, found an old sock in bed — clear weakness in cleaning standards.

Excellent location close to attractions like the Hurtigruten Museum.

Consistently praised: stunning views, close to the Hurtigruten museum and town, great setting and scenery — a major strength.

Friendly staff was mentioned multiple times, enhancing the service perception.

Staff described as friendly, helpful and quick at check-in; changed rooms on request. Some understaffing at breakfast noted but overall service was positive.

Breakfast and food quality were highlighted positively.

Mixed to negative: breakfast buffet often poorly replenished and unhygienic practices reported; some praise for the restaurant but buffet management and cleanliness are problematic.

Features like a sauna and nice lounge were well received.

Basic amenities available but several complaints about kitchen equipment (dirty or insufficient cookware, no teaspoons/glasses) and limited seating/parking at some rorbuer.

General sentiment indicates that guests felt the value was great for the quality received.

Several guests mention reasonable pricing and good location for the price; one billing issue on breakfast noted but overall perceived as good value.