Casa D’ Hiyas Homestay Panglao, Bohol vs Similar Hotels

The room was described as comfortable with good amenities like a smart TV.

Rooms are described as big, pretty, and comfortable.

Rooms were spacious and provided a good sense of privacy and comfort.

Rooms described as spacious and good value, but multiple issues reported: aging rooms, broken or noisy fixtures, occasional malfunctioning AC (though replaced), lack of kitchenware in villas and thin/insufficient bedding—slightly below average.

The property was stated to be very clean and maintained during the stay.

Some concerns about the cleanliness of sheets, but overall maintained hygiene.

Rooms were mentioned as spacious and clean, with well-maintained facilities.

Mixed reports: several guests praised cleanliness (very clean, well-maintained pool) but multiple complaints about old, dirty fixtures, stains on towels, ants and cockroaches in cupboards—overall below the target due to these hygiene issues.

Location is a bit far from the center and access to nearby beaches is complicated due to luxury resorts.

Somewhat far from the main tourist area but accessible by taxi.

Well-located in Panglao Island, though some found it a bit far from restaurants.

Generally good location: close to the beach, quiet and shaded property; some drawbacks noted (remote, few nearby restaurants, rough driveway or 10 min tuk-tuk to tourist area), so kept at the target as overall sentiment is mixed-positive.

The staff were helpful and available for assistance during the stay.

Staff is consistently described as amazing, helpful, and friendly.

Staff were consistently described as warm, friendly, and attentive throughout the reviews.

Consistently strong positive feedback: staff repeatedly described as very friendly, accommodating, polite and helpful; many guests specifically praise reception and workers, so service is rated high to reflect this strength.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Food quality is mentioned positively.

Food received positive feedback, particularly for breakfast and dinner quality.

Mixed feedback: some guests loved the breakfast (called amazing), others found breakfast sparse or complained that extra items cost more; no lunch/dinner options at the property for some guests—slightly below target.

Amenities included a kettle, fridge, and a clean environment.

Facilities such as pool and restaurant are appreciated.

Amenities such as the pool were frequently highlighted as clean and inviting.

Strong points: well-maintained pool(s), some units with private pools; weaknesses include very limited F&B options (breakfast-only in places), no microwave/kitchenware for villas, occasional poor TV/Wi‑Fi—overall slightly above average due to excellent pool facilities.

Extremely good value for money was highlighted in the review.

Considered affordable for the comfort and services offered.

Described as good value with good food and service.

Multiple guests noted good price-to-quality ratio ('you get what you pay for', good property for the price). Positive perceptions of value justify a high rating.