New Siam II vs Similar Hotels

Room quality varies, with mentions of outdated bathrooms and small size.

Mixed: rooms often small but generally acceptable and clean; some guests found beds hard or not comfortable and some bathrooms/fixtures were described as worn or basic.

Rooms described as small and not as portrayed in images.

Rooms described as modest/small and sometimes dated (small size, hard mattress, shower layout, no safe, no elevator) — adequate but basic.

Multiple mentions of issues with cleanliness, including a noticeable mold smell in lower floors.

Generally reported as clean (clean rooms, clean shared showers) but occasional issues noted (dirty shared bathroom sometimes, one day towels smelled, some facilities described as a bit outdated).

Several reviews mentioned dirtiness and bad smells in rooms.

Multiple reviews state rooms are clean/cozy ('propre', '位置價格整潔度'); one report of marijuana smell in the hall is an exception but overall cleanliness is praised.

Several reviews highlight excellent central location, close to tourist attractions.

Outstanding and repeatedly highlighted: extremely convenient near Khao San/nightlife yet tucked away and quiet; repeatedly described as a top feature.

Great location, central and convenient access to attractions.

Repeatedly highlighted as excellent — central, near Khaosan Road, temples and transport; frequent praise for convenience and walking distance to attractions.

Reception staff described as amazing, helpful, and friendly.

Consistently praised: very friendly, helpful staff who assisted with requests (cleaning, dealing with ants) and were described as attentive and welcoming.

Staff were frequently noted as friendly and helpful.

Many reviewers praise staff as friendly, helpful and customer-focused (returned lost items, attentive service); strong positive sentiment for personnel.

Breakfast is frequently praised for variety and quality.

Positive mentions for affordable, good food (specific praise for tom kah kai) and a good/simple breakfast; courtyard appreciated for breakfast ambience.

Positive sentiment about the restaurant quality.

Hotel restaurant and breakfasts receive positive mentions ('tasty', 'breakfasts just great'); restauran discounts also noted.

Pool and breakfast positively noted, but one review mentioned a non-functioning jacuzzi.

Basic amenities: pleasant courtyard, breakfast and occasional in-house restaurant praised, but issues include no lift (many stairs), rudimentary facilities, shared bathrooms for some rooms and occasional older/used fixtures.

Limited amenities reported, but some rooms had the essentials.

Mixed: on-site restaurant and breakfast praised, but missing items noted (no hand soap on request, no kettle in room, only one power outlet, no elevator).

Generally good value for money, though some concerns about room standards.

Frequently noted as excellent value/very good price-quality ratio; guests repeatedly recommend for budget travelers and short stays.

Many found the pricing reasonable for the location.

Frequently called cheap or reasonable for price; multiple guests explicitly note good value for the tariff.