Hotel Charlton vs Similar Hotels

Rooms received mixed feedback, with some being clean but small.

Room quality varies; some reviews cite small room sizes and noise issues.

Mixed comments: some guests had large, well-lit rooms, others report dark, small or dated rooms, worn furniture and bathrooms needing renovation or repair (loose toilet, small baths).

Room quality was mentioned as lacking, with issues related to size and maintenance.

Several reviews highlighted poor cleanliness with issues like hair in the shower and visible dust.

Most reviews mention cleanliness positively, noting that rooms are clean and well-maintained.

Generally reported as clean - multiple reviews explicitly mention 'sauber' / 'super limpio' and good housekeeping, though a few rooms showed wear or minor issues.

The cleanliness was significantly criticized, indicating room for improvement.

Multiple reviews praised the central and convenient location.

Location near the train station is convenient but the area can feel unsafe at night.

Many mentions of a central, convenient location (close to station, shops, pedestrian centre); a few reviews note approach/vehicle access can be tricky.

The location received positive feedback for being central and convenient.

Many reviews noted friendly and helpful staff.

Service was frequently described as friendly and helpful.

Frequently praised as friendly and helpful ('pleasant staff', 'sehr freundliches Personal', 'Toller Service!'), with occasional shortcomings around parking instructions.

Service was highlighted positively, with many reviews mentioning friendly and helpful staff.

The absence of breakfast offerings was a common downside.

There were mentions of no breakfast and limited food options.

Breakfast is often described as good or very good, but several guests find it limited in choice or mediocre and lacking vegan/plant-based options and extra coffee availability.

Breakfast was criticized for quality and quantity in some reviews.

Facilities like parking were appreciated, but lack of elevators was mentioned.

Basic amenities like a kettle are appreciated, but there’s a lack of additional facilities.

Basic amenities present (in-room coffee, secure parking available for many), but repeated negatives: no elevator, unclear garage access, noisy A/C in places and limited facilities.

Amenities like the absence of a mini bar and poor breakfast offerings were noted as negatives.

Good value for the price, though pricing concerns were noted for some rooms.

The pricing is generally considered fair based on the value offered.

Perceived as good value by several guests ('excelente relación precio y calidad'); overall price-quality balance considered positive given location and breakfast.

Value for money was seen as acceptable, though cleanliness and upkeep were a concern.