Premier Inn Lübeck City Stadtgraben vs Similar Hotels

Beds and showers frequently described as good; rooms well equipped with pillow choices, but some rooms face street noise, limited storage and occasional air-con problems.

Beds frequently praised as excellent and soundproofing is noted; some guests reported saggy beds for certain rooms and limited storage space.

Many guests praised comfortable beds and a good shower; some noted limited storage, occasional saggy beds and minor noise for rooms near the station.

Rooms and showers praised and beds often described as excellent, but some guests noted saggy beds, limited storage space and varying noise depending on room placement.

Mixed signals: many guests describe rooms as clean and tidy, but at least one detailed report cites poor cleanliness in the breakfast area and general lapses.

Rooms generally described as clean, but several guests reported issues (bathroom not fully clean, limescale on showerhead) and one comment about limited housekeeping frequency.

Mostly clean rooms and good housekeeping noted, but multiple mentions of bathroom not fully clean (lime scale on showerhead), and at least one report of no daily room cleaning — slight negative impact.

Generally reported as clean (rooms noted as clean and well maintained), though a few guests mentioned bathroom cleanliness issues (showerhead limescale, bathroom not entirely clean).

Consistently praised: central, quiet yet close to station and old town (around a 5-minute walk) and convenient for sightseeing and transport.

Consistently praised as central and convenient—within walking distance to the centre, close to train/bus stations and easy access by car.

Repeatedly described as excellent — very central, within walking distance to the centre and close to train/bus stations; easy to approach by car.

Consistently praised for excellent, central location within walking distance of the centre, close to train/bus stations and easy highway access.

Generally reported as friendly and helpful (easy check-in, attentive staff), though breakfast service clearing is slow in places and one report mentioned unenthusiastic staff/limited drink availability.

Staff repeatedly described as friendly and helpful at reception; however staff shortages affected breakfast service and some operational issues (e.g., air conditioning turned off at night) were reported.

Consistently praised friendly and helpful reception/check-in staff; guests mention kind and accommodating personnel despite occasional staff shortages.

Staff repeatedly described as kind, friendly and helpful at reception and check-in, even with occasional staffing shortages.

Weakest area: frequent complaints about breakfast space being too small, inconsistent/poor food quality (e.g., eggs, cold bacon), overpriced buffet and only vending-style coffee in some cases.

Breakfast is often described as delicious and good quality (bretzls mentioned), yet multiple reports of insufficient seating, limited fresh fruit/vegetables and occasional shortages during busy service.

Breakfast is frequently described as very good/delicious and a highlight, though multiple guests reported insufficient seating and limited fresh fruit/variety at busy times.

Breakfast frequently described as good/tasty, but multiple complaints about insufficient seating in the breakfast area and limited fresh fruit/selection at times.

Parking and basic in-room facilities (coffee/tea options, kettle) are positives; weaknesses include noisy/non-functioning air-con for some guests, limited storage and occasional broken TV/amenity issues.

Basic amenities present (parking, AC, toiletries) but with shortcomings: parking is costly, few EV chargers, AC shutdowns at night, and some rooms lacked extras like a fridge or tissues/conditioner.

Useful amenities like parking and air conditioning mentioned, but complaints include AC being turned off at night, few EV chargers, inability to prebook parking and paid parking fees.

Basic amenities present (parking, AC, soap), but issues reported: air conditioning being turned off at night, lack of tissues/conditioner, limited EV chargers and occasional parking booking problems; parking cost also noted.

Overall perceived as good value for the price by several guests, though some find the breakfast overpriced relative to its quality.

Mixed impressions: breakfast seen as good value by some, but others expected more for the price due to limited breakfast selection, seating issues and extra parking costs.

Generally fair pricing noted for breakfast by some, but several guests felt breakfast selection (especially fresh fruit/veg) and seating did not match the price; parking fees also reduced perceived value.

Mixed views: some found breakfast and overall offer fair for price, while others expected more (better breakfast variety, seating) for the price and complained about daily parking fees.