Premier Inn Stuttgart Bad Cannstatt vs Similar Hotels

Mixed: some comfortable/cozy rooms and good beds, but frequent comments about small rooms, short beds (1.90m), lack of storage shelving, missing fridge and uncomfortable extra/sofa beds.

Multiple complaints about small rooms, limited storage, short beds (1.90m), missing fridge and uncomfortable roll-out/extra beds; some guests did find rooms cozy and comfortable.

Several complaints about small rooms, lack of storage, missing in-room fridge, short beds (1.90 m) and an uncomfortable fold-out bed for third guests, so room quality is below excellent.

Several mentions of small rooms, short beds (1.90m), limited storage, missing fridge and uncomfortable extra/sofa beds — consistent moderate-to-low room-quality feedback.

Consistently praised across reviews ("clean", "Pokój czysty", "It was clean"); no significant cleanliness complaints.

Multiple reviewers explicitly state rooms were clean; overall housekeeping praised across reviews.

Multiple guests explicitly mention clean rooms (e.g. 'clean, nice, cozy', 'Pokój czysty', 'It was clean'), so cleanliness is rated positively.

Multiple reviews explicitly note rooms were clean and cozy; no significant cleanliness complaints across reviews.

Very central and convenient (near main train station, metro, shopping and city centre), though some guests reported significant traffic/tram noise and that the hotel was not as quiet as described.

Very frequently praised as central — near main train station, metro, shopping and city centre — though a few guests reported the hotel is on a noisy main road with tram noise.

Location is repeatedly praised (close to main train station, shopping, metro, city centre). One review notes unexpected noise and proximity to a busy crossing, but overall location is a major positive.

Many guests highlight excellent location near the train station, metro, shopping and city centre; however at least one review strongly criticizes noise from a busy intersection/tram and misleading 'quiet' description.

Mixed reports: several mentions of friendly, helpful staff, but multiple strong complaints about chaotic or unfriendly check-in experiences and service inconsistencies.

Mixed reports: several mentions of very friendly and helpful staff and good English, but some strong negative experiences (unfriendly/chaotic check-in, lack of preparedness).

Mixed reports: several guests praise friendly, helpful staff, but there are strong negative accounts of unfriendly, chaotic check-in and bad attitude for some guests — overall service is inconsistent.

Mixed feedback: several guests praise friendly and helpful staff, but a few report unfriendly or chaotic check-in experiences and issues (e.g., missing towels, poor handling of paperwork).

Breakfast repeatedly praised (wide selection, good quality); a few guests requested more dairy-free alternatives.

Breakfast is repeatedly described as good/rich; some guests wished for more dairy-free options (oat milk / non-dairy yogurt).

Breakfast is described as good/rich with a good selection in multiple reviews; minor notes about limited dairy-free options but generally positive.

Breakfast is frequently praised as good and plentiful; some guests request more dairy-free options, but overall F&B impressions are positive.

Breakfast, bathroom and bar/restaurant praised by guests, but parking is paid and sometimes problematic; limited in-room amenities (no fridge, little shelving) noted.

Breakfast, bar/restaurant and bathrooms noted positively, but parking is extra/expensive and problematic and in-room amenities (fridge, shelving) are limited.

Amenities are mixed: breakfast and bar/restaurant are appreciated, but parking is repeatedly extra and problematic, some missing in-room features (fridge, shelving) and limited alternatives (e.g., dairy-free options) reduce the score.

Amenities are mixed: bathroom and bar/restaurant get positive notes, but parking is paid and problematic for some, and rooms sometimes lack conveniences like a fridge or shelving.

Generally seen as good value or inexpensive with a good price-performance for short stays, though extra parking charges reduce perceived value for some guests.

Several guests explicitly mention very good price/quality, low price and good value for short stays.

Several guests mention very good price/quality and low rates; extra charges for parking and occasional service issues slightly reduce perceived value.

Many guests comment the hotel is inexpensive and offers good price–performance; positive value impressions outweigh occasional extra charges (parking).