Village Arraial BY MN Hotéis vs Similar Hotels

Overall decent but the structure requires improvements.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Mention of problems with the shower indicates room concerns.

Frequent complaints about old/deteriorated furniture, outdated installations, leaks, broken fixtures and noisy appliances; room quality is notably below average.

The hotel's structure needs renovation.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

There are mentions of needing maintenance on installations, which may hint at cleanliness issues.

Multiple reviews mention dirty towels and bedding, stained/unclean bathrooms, floor cleanliness issues and mold smell in older installations — clear negative sentiment on cleanliness.

Excellent location near the center of Arraial.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Great location close to the airport.

Mixed but generally positive: several comments note good location and proximity to the airport, while a few mention being distant from the town center — overall location leans positive.

Attentive staff and good hospitality.

Incrível.

All staff are described as friendly and educated.

Consistently praised staff and atendimento (many comments calling employees very friendly, specifically thanking Eliza); several reviews highlight excellent service, so service is a strong positive.

Breakfast quality is average.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Great breakfast highlighted in the pros.

Breakfast is often described as good/varied by several guests, though some note it is basic or repetitive and sometimes untidy; overall mildly positive.

Average, with a mediocre breakfast.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Amenities present (pool, bar, balcony in some rooms, 24h reception) but issues reported (loud fridge, thin walls, limited parking); amenities are usable but show maintenance/noise concerns.

Good value given the location and service.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Multiple reviewers explicitly praise the cost-benefit and call it good value; despite shortcomings in maintenance/cleanliness, perceived value is a clear positive.