Hotel Dan Inn Planalto São Paulo by Nacional Inn vs Similar Hotels

Rooms are comfortable and well-maintained, although some noted outdated air conditioning.

Mixed reviews on room conditions, with comments on old furniture and maintenance issues.

Several complaints about small or cramped rooms, old/damaged shutters and air conditioning, tiny showers and thin blankets—room condition is a notable weakness.

Rooms reported to be clean and comfortable, though some guests had issues with amenities.

Generally clean and well-organized, but some reviews mention old facilities impacting perception.

Several reviews mentioned dirty bathrooms and issues with room upkeep, impacting cleanliness perception.

Multiple guests reported inadequate cleaning (hair and trash under beds, rooms not fully cleaned), indicating below-standard cleanliness.

Several reviews mentioned cleanliness issues like sewer smell and less satisfactory conditions.

Highly rated for its convenient location in proximity to attractions.

Guests frequently mentioned the hotel's prime location, close to important attractions.

Repeatedly highlighted as excellent and very convenient (close to attractions and 25 de Março), a clear strong point for the hotel.

The location is frequently praised for being central and convenient.

Guests praised the staff for their professionalism and assistance.

Many guests praised the staff's attentiveness and cordiality, particularly in reception.

Generally praised: staff described as attentive, helpful and polite on many occasions, with a few isolated service lapses (e.g., slow response for extra blanket).

Employees are highlighted as friendly and professional in multiple reviews.

Breakfast options rated as good but noted for being repetitive.

The breakfast was frequently highlighted as excellent by numerous guests.

Breakfast is frequently described as diverse, plentiful and a highlight—one isolated complaint about egg policy does not outweigh generally excellent feedback.

Reviews mentioned limited breakfast options and cleanliness concerns in dining areas.

Basic amenities provided, but missing some enhancements like hooks in bathrooms.

Certain amenities received positive feedback, while others, like the elevator and cleanliness, were criticized.

Breakfast and in-room fridge were positively noted; some negative mentions about removed coffee machine, older elevator and worn equipment, but overall amenities are perceived as good.

Amenities are good but could benefit from more options as per guest suggestions.

Good cost-benefit ratio highlighted, despite some noise issues.

Perceived as a good deal given the breakfast and location, despite some infrastructure concerns.

Multiple guests mentioned good cost-benefit and comfortable stays; a few issues (e.g., early check-in charge and room allocation) slightly temper the perception but value remains strong.

Comments suggest mixed feelings on value; some reviews indicated better alternatives available.