
Compare similar hotels across guest insights, rooms, location, amenities, value, nearby attractions and suitability to understand the trade-offs before you choose.
Lodgegrid Decision Intelligence

Rooms
9.1Rooms were noted as new and clean, but some issues with ventilation reported.
Cleanliness
8.6The reviews mention issues with damp smell and drainage problems in some rooms.
Location
10.0Multiple reviews praised the central and convenient location.
No close alternative was identified for this preference.




Ubud Sensasi Bungalows
8.2/10KT. Kuaya Home Stay
8.5/10Goutama Homestay
9.2/10Sania's House
7.4/10Ubud Sensasi Bungalows
7.9Rooms mentioned as clean but some comments note wear and tear.
KT. Kuaya Home Stay
7.3Room sizes varied, with some guests noting small and damp rooms.
Goutama Homestay
9.1Rooms were noted as new and clean, but some issues with ventilation reported.
Sania's House
6.6Issues with mold, old beds, and general discomfort noted, leading to a below-average score.
Ubud Sensasi Bungalows
6.4One review mentions a bathroom that is the 'dirtiest' seen and issues with shower pressure.
KT. Kuaya Home Stay
7.9Several comments mentioned issues with odours in the room and dirty bathroom items.
Goutama Homestay
8.6The reviews mention issues with damp smell and drainage problems in some rooms.
Sania's House
6.1Numerous mentions of unclean rooms and issues with mold, leading to a lowered score.
Ubud Sensasi Bungalows
8.9One review indicates the convenience of nearby amenities and attractions.
KT. Kuaya Home Stay
9.4Multiple reviews highlighted a great location, central yet quiet.
Goutama Homestay
10.0Multiple reviews praised the central and convenient location.
Sania's House
9.1Multiple reviews highlight excellent location in the heart of Ubud, making it a strong positive aspect.
Ubud Sensasi Bungalows
9.4Multiple reviews highlight friendly and accommodating staff.
KT. Kuaya Home Stay
9.4Overall, guests praised the staff's friendliness and helpfulness.
Goutama Homestay
9.6Staff was described as wonderful and accommodating.
Sania's House
8.1Staff mentioned as friendly and accommodating, aligning with positive sentiments about service.
Ubud Sensasi Bungalows
—KT. Kuaya Home Stay
—Goutama Homestay
—Sania's House
—Ubud Sensasi Bungalows
8.4Positive remarks on nearby dining options.
KT. Kuaya Home Stay
7.9Breakfast quality was mentioned as average in some reviews, with suggestions for improvement.
Goutama Homestay
8.1Breakfast was described as not very good despite being included.
Sania's House
7.1Breakfast quality mentioned positively, but some guests noted the need for more drink amenities.
Ubud Sensasi Bungalows
7.4Some basic amenities are lacking, but guests appreciated the pool.
KT. Kuaya Home Stay
8.4Amenities were generally good but some guests suggested additional items would improve the experience.
Goutama Homestay
9.1Amenities mentioned included breakfast and a pool, but some aspects could be improved.
Sania's House
7.1Limited or missing amenities noted in several reviews; however, some amenities received positive remarks.
Ubud Sensasi Bungalows
8.4Several reviews suggest it is a good value for the price.
KT. Kuaya Home Stay
8.8Value perceived as decent considering the pricing and location.
Goutama Homestay
9.6Overall great value for the price, as mentioned in positive reviews.
Sania's House
7.6Mixed reviews about overall value, but some guests praised their experience for the location.
Ubud Sensasi Bungalows
Cap Bagong TattooKT. Kuaya Home Stay
Puri Saren AgungGoutama Homestay
Ida Tjokorda Gde Agung SukawatiSania's House
Ida Tjokorda Gde Agung Sukawati