Intercity Brasilia Led Aguas Claras vs Similar Hotels

Rooms are often described as spacious, organized and comfortable, with good showers and minibar; negatives include small/misrepresented bed sizes, noisy beds, AC failures and some maintenance issues.

Spacious and beautifully decorated rooms.

Rooms were noted as spacious and comfortable, but some cleanliness issues were reported.

Rooms, beds and showers receive repeated positive comments (spacious, comfortable, wonderful shower), with only occasional notes about small shower box or narrow bathroom.

Multiple reviewers reported bathroom cleanliness issues (dirty shower box), rooms not being serviced during stay, towels of poor quality and mosquito presence at the pool—overall below average cleanliness.

Room cleanliness mentioned positively, but minor issues noted.

The hotel had cleanliness issues noted with dirty dishes and rooms, impacting the cleanliness score.

Multiple reviewers noted issues: dark bathroom, missing toilet paper and some general maintenance/cleaning shortcomings impacting perceived cleanliness.

Frequently praised for location and proximity to shopping; reviewers consistently cited location as a strong point.

Valuable location with easy access to city center.

The hotel is well-located with easy access to the airport and local attractions.

Location is consistently praised across reviews as excellent and convenient for exploring Brasília.

Mixed: several positive notes about attentive staff (e.g., Josemar) and helpful team, but also complaints about poor reception communication, long check-in waits and unresolved requests (remote battery not replaced).

Service highlighted as friendly and attentive.

Despite minor issues, the service staff were praised for their friendliness and willingness to assist.

Staff are frequently praised (attentive reception, messengers, restaurant team) but there is a serious negative incident reported where a host denied access to a second guest and communication was rude, partially offsetting otherwise strong service comments.

Breakfast is frequently praised (many 'excellent' or 'perfect' comments), though some suggest improvements in juice quality and variety.

Breakfast was consistently praised as delicious and plentiful.

Breakfast was well-received by some, but considered lacking by others regarding variety.

Breakfast is often highlighted as a strong point and there are good meal offers, but at least one guest experienced breakfast service ending early (tapioca/omelette closed before official time), creating some dissatisfaction.

Sauna and pet-kit praised, but several amenity problems noted: cold pool, mosquito/pool cleanliness, jacuzzi paid or not working, restaurant closed weekends, limited streaming/Netflix and spotty Wi‑Fi.

Some amenities mentioned, room features noted positively.

Amenities like the fitness center were mentioned positively, though some rooms lacked cleanliness.

Some good touches reported (welcome water bottle, attentive staff and restaurant), but mentions of missing covers and missing toilet paper indicate inconsistent amenity/housekeeping provision.

Many reviewers explicitly highlight excellent cost-benefit and call it great value for a 3-star hotel; value is a clear strong point.

Good value for the quality received during the stay.

Some guests felt the price was high for the quality, particularly regarding breakfast options.

Mixed signals: several guests praise the cost-benefit and consider it excellent value, while at least one reviewer felt the price was above average.