Scandic Go, Upplandsgatan 4 vs Similar Hotels

Rooms were described as adequate, but some were considered small.

Rooms were noted to be small and basic, with some issues like poor lighting.

Several reviews noted issues with room size and comfort.

Mixed feedback: some guests had comfortable, spacious, well-insulated rooms and good beds, while others reported very small / basement rooms without windows, thin walls (noise), lack of in-room fridge and problems regulating temperature.

Some guests mentioned cleanliness issues, affecting the overall score.

There were issues with cleanliness and odors in the bathroom.

Some reviews mentioned issues with cleanliness and maintenance.

Generally praised across reviews (multiple mentions of 'clean', 'pulito', 'curatenia'), with a few issues noted (bathroom flooding with curtain, some towels with odour, recycling bin emptied but bathroom bin left during a 5-day stay).

Many guests highlighted the excellent central location.

Centrally located with easy access to transport.

The location was highlighted positively and deemed convenient.

Consistently highlighted as a strong point (close to central station, metro, buses; good connectivity and convenient for city trips).

Numerous reviews praised the attentive and friendly staff.

The staff was described as very nice and friendly.

Guests praised the friendly and helpful staff.

Staff repeatedly described as friendly and helpful in many reviews; a single report of non-response about parking is a minor negative versus largely positive staff remarks.

Not specifically mentioned, but reasonable expectations for a hotel.

Breakfast was frequently praised, with good variety.

Lack of breakfast options was a common complaint.

Breakfast received praise in several reviews ('wonderful'), though a few guests found it sparse or not fully matching the price — generally positive but a bit inconsistent.

Lack of some basic amenities like microwaves reported by guests.

Some amenities such as a gym were missing; improvements were suggested.

Amenities were acceptable but could improve, particularly breakfast options.

Useful on-site features noted (laundry machines, sustainability focus), but some amenity gaps reported (no fridge in some rooms, limited air conditioning, shower curtain causing flooding).

Good price-performance balance noted by guests.

Value was considered good for the location, but there were mixed feelings about room quality.

Guests felt the price did not justify the experience.

Frequently described as good value or excellent price for location; breakfast pricing debated by a few but overall perceived as fair for cost.