Havsdalsgrenda Geilo Apartments vs Similar Hotels

Overall good with some concerns about bed comfort and space.

Room experiences are mixed: some spacious, well-equipped rooms and apartments; others noted small showers, cold rooms, very high beds, lofts with low headroom and heavy duvets.

Rooms described as spacious, well-equipped and some with terraces, but reports also mention worn beds causing back pain and some rooms feeling outdated or awkwardly arranged.

Rooms were described as spacious and modern but some complaints about size and amenities.

General sentiments imply facilities could be cleaner, though not an outright complaint.

Multiple reviews explicitly note clean rooms, freshly cleaned cabins and apartments; a few mentions of worn carpets but overall cleanliness very positive.

Multiple guests reported poor housekeeping: rooms not cleaned during multi-night stays, no fresh towels, found food remnants and hair in bed/bathroom; pool was reported dirty by at least one reviewer.

Some reviewers noted cleanliness but mentioned issues such as bed making and instructions.

Excellent location near amenities, hiking areas, and scenic views.

Location repeatedly praised as central, quiet and convenient (close to station/centre) in many reviews.

Location is often praised as excellent for Rallarvegen, skiing and general sightseeing; noted as a strong asset though quieter in summer and somewhat remote for non-winter visits.

Multiple reviews praised the central location and convenience.

Guests praised the staff's helpfulness and kindness extensively.

Generally friendly and helpful staff and good restaurant service reported, but several comments mention impersonal/self check-in kiosks and occasional check-in issues.

Service is mixed but generally positive: several guests praised friendly, helpful reception staff (room upgrades, restaurant bookings), while others reported staffing shortages, unkept reservation promises and unprofessional handling.

Staff were described as friendly and helpful, quickly addressing issues.

No specific mentions, assumed standard quality for this hotel tier.

Breakfast and some restaurant meals receive praise (good buffet, generous portions), but there are isolated complaints about slow service and disappointing restaurant food.

Breakfast and F&B receive frequent praise—described as abundant, high quality and a highlight for many guests—though a few complained about buffet chaos and weak standard coffee.

Positive remarks on food quality but some concerns over availability and pricing.

Positive feedback on facilities like the pool and sauna, but some limitations noted.

Amenities like pool, sauna, parking and EV charging, kitchenettes and fridges are frequently appreciated, though some guests note limited staff presence or minor shortcomings.

Amenities are good overall (pool, sauna included for some stays, historic public spaces), but guests reported the jacuzzi often closed/cold, a sometimes dirty pool, and limited elevator access in the building.

Facilities like the pool and spa received positive feedback.

Strong value appreciated considering the amenities and location.

Several guests explicitly mention good value and reasonable prices; one comment noted a cabin felt expensive for two, but overall value sentiment is positive.

Mixed perceptions: some guests find the price justified by charm and services, while others felt the hotel was expensive given issues with cleaning, amenities or service lapses.

Some concerns about pricing, especially for food and breakfast options.