New Siam II vs Similar Hotels

Mixed reports: some renovated rooms praised, but many standard rooms described as dated, with noisy/old air conditioning, small size and uncomfortable beds in places.

Mixed: rooms often small but generally acceptable and clean; some guests found beds hard or not comfortable and some bathrooms/fixtures were described as worn or basic.

Rooms range from comfortable, spacious and good value to somewhat dated (walls needing refreshing, old furniture, heat on top floors); mixed feedback leads to a below-average room quality rating.

Rooms described as modest/small and sometimes dated (small size, hard mattress, shower layout, no safe, no elevator) — adequate but basic.

Rooms frequently described as clean or 'très propre' and 'clean & compact' by several guests; overall cleanliness is a clear positive.

Generally reported as clean (clean rooms, clean shared showers) but occasional issues noted (dirty shared bathroom sometimes, one day towels smelled, some facilities described as a bit outdated).

Multiple reviews note daily cleaning and generally very clean rooms and pool; a few comments mention dated walls or older furniture but overall cleanliness is praised.

Multiple reviews state rooms are clean/cozy ('propre', '位置價格整潔度'); one report of marijuana smell in the hall is an exception but overall cleanliness is praised.

Consistently highlighted as a strong point — very convenient for river taxis/boat, close to riverside attractions and Khao San area.

Outstanding and repeatedly highlighted: extremely convenient near Khao San/nightlife yet tucked away and quiet; repeatedly described as a top feature.

Location frequently called fantastic and central (walking distance to Khao San and many restaurants), though some mention a 10-minute walk or slight distance from main sights.

Repeatedly highlighted as excellent — central, near Khaosan Road, temples and transport; frequent praise for convenience and walking distance to attractions.

Staff repeatedly praised as friendly, helpful and welcoming; multiple mentions of good service and attentive personnel.

Consistently praised: very friendly, helpful staff who assisted with requests (cleaning, dealing with ants) and were described as attentive and welcoming.

Staff repeatedly described as friendly, helpful and quick to resolve issues (front desk singled out), though renovation communication and occasional noise-related discomfort tempered the score.

Many reviewers praise staff as friendly, helpful and customer-focused (returned lost items, attentive service); strong positive sentiment for personnel.

Mixed feedback: some guests enjoyed a very good buffet breakfast, while others found the breakfast poor or limited (notably when on half-board).

Positive mentions for affordable, good food (specific praise for tom kah kai) and a good/simple breakfast; courtyard appreciated for breakfast ambience.

Breakfast is repeatedly described as very good, extensive and satisfying; overall food and beverage receives consistently positive mentions.

Hotel restaurant and breakfasts receive positive mentions ('tasty', 'breakfasts just great'); restauran discounts also noted.

Pool is a frequently mentioned asset (cool, pleasant, towels provided); however some issues reported such as small balconies and intermittent internet connectivity.

Basic amenities: pleasant courtyard, breakfast and occasional in-house restaurant praised, but issues include no lift (many stairs), rudimentary facilities, shared bathrooms for some rooms and occasional older/used fixtures.

Pool is praised as clean and large by many; small gym and occasional mismatch between photos and reality noted by some guests, but overall amenities are solid for the price.

Mixed: on-site restaurant and breakfast praised, but missing items noted (no hand soap on request, no kettle in room, only one power outlet, no elevator).

Multiple guests explicitly note good value or favourable price-quality ratio; generally seen as good value for a budget guesthouse/hotel.

Frequently noted as excellent value/very good price-quality ratio; guests repeatedly recommend for budget travelers and short stays.

Several reviewers explicitly mention excellent price/quality and good value, making value one of the stronger aspects of the stay.

Frequently called cheap or reasonable for price; multiple guests explicitly note good value for the tariff.