Uppsala City Hostel vs Similar Hotels

Some complaints about room size and comfort of beds; overall experience varied.

Mixed sentiments, with some mentions of outdated fittings and basic quality.

Rooms were described as basic but adequate, though some guests found issues with bedding and basic amenities.

Rooms are described as charming and tastefully renovated in an old style with some having kitchens; however many comments about very small rooms, cramped bathrooms and variable bed comfort.

Rooms were reported as clean; however, some concerns about the shared bathrooms were noted.

There are comments on cleanliness being satisfactory, with the description stating it was very clean and fresh.

Several reviews mentioned the cleanliness of the rooms, but some noted unpleasant odors and issues with maintenance.

Multiple reviews note dust (very dusty bunk bed), 'smutsig trappmatta', strange smells in rooms and generally not well cleaned in common areas — below average cleanliness.

Very convenient location close to the city center, easy to access.

Multiple reviews highlight the super central location with easy access to attractions.

The location was generally favorable, especially for those interested in historical sites, though it was noted to be far from the city center.

Consistently praised as central, within walking distance to the station and town centre — a major strength mentioned across many reviews.

Reception was very helpful and friendly throughout the stay.

Pleasant feedback regarding the reception staff and their helpfulness.

Guests appreciated the service, especially the ease of check-in and the assistance with booking changes.

Several guests report quick responses, friendly/trevligt bemötande and good service; only minor check-in information issues that were resolved by phone.

No specific mentions in the reviews; average expectations for this hotel tier.

No specific feedback, but a decent reference to breakfast arrangements and self-catering.

Breakfast options were limited, though some guest reviews indicated satisfaction with the basic offerings.

Repeated complaints about breakfast: sparsmakad/poor breakfast and breakfast being served at a 'sister' hotel 10 minutes away — a notable weak point.

Basic amenities provided; kitchen was noted as outdated.

Comments note the lack of certain amenities and basic kitchen equipment.

Amenities generally met basic needs, with a well-equipped kitchen mentioned positively.

Kitchen areas and evening tea are appreciated, but guests report missing items (no mini-fridge, no shampoo in one case), few toilets/showers and some functional shortcomings.

Fair pricing for the accommodations, though some felt it was slightly overpriced.

Reviews express satisfaction with the overall value and reasonable costs.

Given the pricing, many guests felt they received decent value for their stay.

Several guests mention good location and price; despite some saying photos were better than reality, many consider the price reasonable for the central position and character of the property.