OYO 104 Q House 3 Apartments vs Similar Hotels

Comments on outdated furniture, albeit some positive notes on the apartment's quietness.

Mixed feedback on room quality, with some references to space and comfort contrasted by criticisms of cleanliness.

Rooms described as old and needing maintenance.

Multiple reviews highlighted poor cleanliness with dirty floors and linens.

Multiple reviews mention poor cleanliness and unpleasant odors, indicating significant room for improvement.

The smell of cigarettes in the room and humidity issues mentioned.

Guests appreciated the proximity to markets and services.

Frequent mentions of good location, contributing positively to the overall experience.

Great location with accessibility to food and other services.

Most guests noted friendly and helpful staff, despite one negative experience.

Generally positive remarks about staff interactions, though there are notable complaints about respect and service timelines.

Wonderful staff and exceptional service highlighted in multiple reviews.

Standard quality for this hotel tier, no specific details mentioned.

No specific mentions; assumed standard quality for this hotel tier.

Food options accessible but limited feedback provided.

Good amenities like parking and Wi-Fi were mentioned positively.

Mentioned amenities are viewed positively, but some essential items were lacking in certain apartments.

Basic kitchen utensils missing but overall good amenities.

Many reviews highlighted good pricing, especially for larger accommodations.

Comments suggest that the value reflects the lower price point, resulting in adjusted expectations.

Generally perceived as a fair value for the quality experienced.