Hotel Etoile Du Nord vs Similar Hotels

Mixed feedback: some rooms described as new, comfortable and quiet, but several complaints about old/uncomfortable mattresses, broken curtains/TV remotes, insufficient towels and small/cramped bathrooms.

Guests appreciated the spacious and well-designed rooms with high-quality amenities.

Rooms described as spacious and comfortable by several guests.

Spacious apartments with good facilities, though some reviews mentioned firm mattresses.

Generally praised (several mentions of 'propre', 'clean' and well maintained areas) but tempered by complaints about inconsistent housekeeping, insufficient towel changes, a report of dead cockroaches after disinfestation and one guest explicitly citing cleanliness as an issue.

Multiple reviews praised the cleanliness and immaculate state of the accommodations.

Overall cleanliness mentioned positively in various reviews.

The apartment was described as very clean and well-maintained.

Multiple guests call the location 'well situated' or 'excellent' and strategically placed for walking; one repeated note that the hotel is not in the absolute city centre and taxis/public transport can be inconsistent, limiting full walkability.

Described as perfect for exploring the city, enhancing the overall experience.

Generally good location described, with some mentions of parking difficulties.

Quoted as very well situated, within walking distance of key attractions.

Strongly positive across many reviews: staff repeatedly described as helpful, friendly and accommodating (names praised, staff went beyond duty). A few notes about inattentive or scatterbrained staff exist but overall service is a clear strength.

Numerous comments highlighted the staff's professionalism and helpfulness.

Numerous mentions of friendly and helpful staff, particularly highlighting individuals.

The staff were described as helpful, accommodating, and friendly.

Breakfast and rooftop food receive high praise (varied, fresh, very good, terrace service 10/10). Some complaints about dinner service on half‑board (delays, unavailable menu items) and a few missing breakfast product types.

No specific feedback but standard for this hotel tier.

Not specifically mentioned in reviews; standard quality for this hotel tier.

Not specifically mentioned; considered standard quality for this hotel tier.

Positive mentions include rooftop dining and hammam; negatives include repeated lack of parking, limited accessibility for special needs, scarce towel racks and at least one note of weak Wi‑Fi.

Reviewers mentioned good amenities, though some suggested improvements like a coffee machine.

Reviewers mentioned a lack of IPTV and some minor amenities missing.

Amenities were generally good, with requests for a microwave noted.

Multiple guests explicitly state good or very good value for the price and satisfaction with what was offered; occasional service/detail shortcomings slightly reduce this score.

Favorable impressions on pricing in relation to the quality of stay.

Overall value indicated as good, though some mentions of extra costs.

Good value given the spacious accommodations and location.