First Camp Enåbadet - Rättvik vs Similar Hotels

Mixed: cosy, well-equipped cabins and some newly replaced mattresses reported, but several complaints about poor/child-sized beds, thin walls (noisy/lyhört) and small room sizes.

Mixed sentiments about room quality with mentions of cramped spaces and missing items.

Well-equipped kitchen and good furniture in the cabin.

Noted for being decent with great views, though some rooms had issues.

Mixed reports: several guests report dirty shared WC/dusch and mouldy/stale smells in some cabins, while others explicitly said their unit was clean. Overall cleanliness is inconsistent.

Some reviews mention uncleanliness and odor issues in accommodations.

Mention of bad bathroom ventilation and unclean outdoor areas.

General reviews mention that it was fresh and well-cleaned.

Very positive: close to centre, Siljan and family activities (high-ropes, minigolf, canoeing), quiet setting appreciated by many guests — strong location score.

Multiple reviews highlight excellent location near attractions.

Fantastic location with beautiful views and proximity to town.

Many comments indicated the listing was misleading regarding the distance to central locations.

Generally praised reception staff for flexibility and service, but there are communication lapses (e.g., gate closing at midnight not communicated) and at least one privacy/GDPR incident with booking papers left visible.

Positive comments about friendly and helpful staff.

Overall friendly service and ease of contact with staff.

Mixed sentiments, with mentions of communication but some negatives regarding breakfast service.

Generally weak: many guests self-cater or report no breakfast offered; limited selection in the small service shop reduces F&B convenience.

Not specifically mentioned in reviews; assigned average rating.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Complaints about breakfast service reflected negatively on this aspect.

Moderate: good on-site activities and some well-equipped cabins, but issues noted with lack of potable water provision in some units, sparse service shop, missing TV and limited sockets near beds.

Some positive feedback on available amenities, but also some concerns about missing items.

Good amenities, though some insufficient outdoor lighting.

Functional kitchen and good space, though lacking some items.

Frequently described as good value and priceworthy by multiple guests; perceived as a budget-friendly option with acceptable offerings for the price.

Generally considered good value, but some reviews indicated that cleanliness impacted perception of value.

Good value, but noted issues with parking and signage.

Overall, guests felt it was worth the price despite some discrepancies.