B Hotel Brasilia vs Similar Hotels

Comfortable rooms with excellent views.

Most guests found rooms comfortable and well-equipped.

Rooms, beds and showers receive repeated positive comments (spacious, comfortable, wonderful shower), with only occasional notes about small shower box or narrow bathroom.

Many guests call rooms spacious and comfortable, with good beds and linens; some negatives include small TV, noisy AC, shower temperature oscillation, darker rooms and a bed size mismatch in one report.

Some areas need maintenance; carpets are stained and there's a low pressure shower.

Rooms were clean, but some issues with service not addressing specific requests.

Multiple reviewers noted issues: dark bathroom, missing toilet paper and some general maintenance/cleaning shortcomings impacting perceived cleanliness.

Consistently praised across reviews for limpeza and tidy rooms; one minor report of an adhesive on the floor but otherwise described as very clean.

Exceptional views and prime location.

Ideal location near shopping areas and central attractions.

Location is consistently praised across reviews as excellent and convenient for exploring Brasília.

Frequently noted as well located (in front of Brasília Shopping, convenient access); guests repeatedly praise the location.

Most staff were very attentive, but one waiter was rude.

High praise for attentive and friendly staff, contributing positively to the overall experience.

Staff are frequently praised (attentive reception, messengers, restaurant team) but there is a serious negative incident reported where a host denied access to a second guest and communication was rude, partially offsetting otherwise strong service comments.

Multiple comments highlight exceptional, friendly and attentive staff and reception; service is a key positive in many reviews.

Breakfast had variety but items were overpriced and some tastes were not exceptional.

Breakfast options were considered average with room for improvement.

Breakfast is often highlighted as a strong point and there are good meal offers, but at least one guest experienced breakfast service ending early (tapioca/omelette closed before official time), creating some dissatisfaction.

Breakfast and restaurant repeatedly praised as varied and excellent; isolated service delays (e.g., tapioca orders) reported but overall F&B is a strong positive.

Lack of spa and some amenities were charged extra, impacting comfort.

Good amenities overall, although some guests noted limitations in gym facilities.

Some good touches reported (welcome water bottle, attentive staff and restaurant), but mentions of missing covers and missing toilet paper indicate inconsistent amenity/housekeeping provision.

Good leisure facilities (pool, sauna) and restaurant mentioned positively, but issues reported with unstable Wi‑Fi, a broken vending machine and a small reception/lobby that reduces perceived luxury.

Overall good but felt extra charges for certain items were unusual.

Some guests felt the price could be high, especially during peak times.

Mixed signals: several guests praise the cost-benefit and consider it excellent value, while at least one reviewer felt the price was above average.

Several guests explicitly note good cost–benefit and satisfaction; a few comment the hotel feels more like 4 than 5 stars which lowers perceived value for some.