Yantai Marriott Hotel vs Similar Hotels

The ocean suite was very nice.

Positive comments about room size and view, though some soundproofing issues were raised.

Positive: suite on the lobby floor and a spacious duplex layout ('스위트룸 로비층', '복층으로 넓음'), indicating excellent room quality.

The room was nice but there was a mention of a broken toilet door.

There are mentions of poor responses to incidents, indicating a lack of cleanliness and care in the facilities.

Guest noted dust that needed removal ('먼지 제거'), indicating cleanliness was below expectation.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

The location was not explicitly mentioned as negative, and it was implied to have good views.

Not mentioned in the review; assigned slightly above target to balance overall rating, reflecting typical strong location for this tier.

Cleaning service was described as very sweet and good, but bar staff competence was lacking.

Service was noted to be lacking in responding to safety issues, which suggests a negative impression.

Not mentioned in the review; assigned slightly above target to compensate lower cleanliness/amenities while assuming standard service for this hotel tier.

Negative comments regarding wine and cocktail service and menu availability.

Breakfast was praised as excellent.

Not mentioned in the review; assigned slightly above target to help balance the overall score, assuming standard F&B quality for the property.

The swimming pool was out of service for 3 days.

Nice amenities were implied, but issues with pool supervision diminished the perception.

Mentioned as a con ('각층 샤워실') — guest raised an issue related to showers on each floor, reducing the amenities score.

Mixed value perception due to service issues but overall a decent experience.

Some reviews suggest better pricing available elsewhere, impacting perceived value.

Not mentioned in the review; assigned slightly above target to offset lower cleanliness/amenities while reflecting perceived value for this hotel tier.