Grichting Hotel & Serviced Apartments vs Similar Hotels

The rooms were spacious but had issues with noise insulation and outdated furnishings.

Many comments about outdated, 1970s-style rooms, worn furniture, old carpets, uncomfortable beds, small rooms and problematic bathrooms (high tub step, poor shower).

Rooms are often described as pretty and comfortable, but several guests note the hotel spans two separate buildings, inconsistent room equipment (some lack balcony/view), and at least one report of overheating—room quality is mixed.

Comments indicated some rooms were small and challenging to manage space.

There were multiple complaints regarding cleanliness, including unpleasant smells and mold.

Repeated reports of insufficient bathroom and spa cleanliness, dirty pools/baths, worn/soiled carpeting in fitness areas; several guests explicitly call out poor hygiene and lack of upkeep.

Multiple reviews praise very clean rooms and modern, very clean bath facilities; general comments indicate high cleanliness standards.

Several reviews mentioned that the hotel was clean and well-kept.

The hotel is well-located in the center of the village, making it convenient for guests.

Consistently praised: central/very good location, easy parking, excellent access to thermal baths and attractive mountain views.

Numerous mentions of a perfect, central location close to parking, restaurants, village and ski lift access; location is consistently highlighted positively.

Multiple reviews highlighted the excellent location, close to attractions.

Most reviews indicate that the staff were friendly and helpful, which positively impacted the overall experience.

Mixed operational issues (no room service, empty minibar, occasional missing supplies) but multiple reviews praise a smiling, helpful reception and very attentive breakfast staff; overall front-desk and breakfast service received consistently positive mentions.

Staff repeatedly described as very friendly, available, exceptional and multilingual; service is a clear strong point across reviews.

The staff was consistently described as friendly and accommodating.

Food received positive feedback, especially breakfast, despite some inconsistencies.

Polarized feedback: several guests praise a superb, large breakfast buffet and attentive service, while others report mediocre breakfast (no fresh fruit, dry pastries, broken coffee machines).

Breakfast is frequently described as perfect and varied; the restaurant is noted as creative and good by several guests though one or two comments raise minor concerns.

Breakfast and restaurant services received positive remarks from guests.

While the amenities included a pool and restaurant, there were issues with maintenance and cleanliness.

Strong positive for thermal bath access, pool and spa facilities and good breakfast setup in some stays; offset by reports of poorly maintained fitness equipment, lack of Wi‑Fi/minibar issues and no air conditioning in some rooms.

Spa, thermal pools and sauna facilities are repeatedly praised as excellent, modern and a major attraction of the hotel.

The breakfast and on-site restaurant were well-reviewed by guests.

Guests felt that some aspects of their stay could be improved for the price paid.

Multiple complaints that prices are excessive given the state of rooms, cleanliness and some services; guests explicitly call out poor quality/price ratio.

Some positive hints (breakfast included, parking discount) but issues like split buildings, occasional room limitations and minor construction inconvenience reduce perceived value for some guests.

Guests felt they received good value for their stay considering location and amenities.