Annex Copenhagen vs Similar Hotels

Room quality was mixed; some rooms were noted as small and dimly lit.

Room sizes and amenities received mixed feedback, with some mentioning smallness and basic furnishings.

Rooms are often described as small, old or Spartan with some positive exceptions (a few guests had fresh/spacious rooms). Shared or outdated bathrooms reduce the room-quality score.

Rooms are described as comfortable and well-presented, though there are mentions of needing more practical features.

Cleanliness was highlighted positively in multiple reviews but had mention of some issues that slightly affected rating.

Several reviews mentioned issues with cleanliness, specifically in shared bathrooms and rooms.

Multiple reviews mention poor room cleanliness: bad smells, stained carpet and ‘not clean’ or ‘not super fresh’ shared toilets. Overall cleanliness is a clear negative.

The hotel is consistently described as clean and well-maintained by several reviewers.

The location was praised for proximity to central station and various amenities.

Multiple reviews praised the excellent location near transport and city attractions.

Consistently praised: very close to the train station and central for sightseeing. Location is a major recurring pro across languages.

The hotel is praised for its convenient location near the train station and central attractions.

Helpful staff and quick check-in and check-out were noted positively.

Reviews highlighted friendly and helpful staff.

Staff repeatedly described as friendly and helpful in several reviews, though one report noted an unhelpful receptionist over a blocked toilet. Generally service is viewed positively.

Staff are mentioned multiple times as friendly and helpful, contributing positively to the overall experience.

Food and beverage complaints include high breakfast prices and a non-functioning TV.

Breakfast received consistent praise for its quality and variety.

Breakfast is often described as satisfying and good by multiple guests, though some found it expensive for what was offered. Overall generally positive.

Breakfast is generally rated positively, with some mentions of the buffet needing improvement.

Amenities had some positive mentions but also criticism regarding morning breakfast pricing.

Amenities were generally acceptable, though there were mentions of missing items like shampoo.

Amenities are minimal for many guests: shared bathrooms, limited bathroom fittings, few sockets and paid-for coffee were mentioned. Functionally adequate but basic.

Amenities such as a coffee machine and heated bathroom tiles are noted, with some requests for additional features.

The overall value was considered fair but complicated by extra charges for breakfast.

Many guests found the rates reasonable for the location and services provided.

Mixed to negative: several guests felt the hotel was overpriced for its standard (one called it effectively 2-star), while others found it acceptable for a short stay near the station.

Value for money is considered fair, but there are mentions of the quality not matching the cost in one review.