Dogan Hotel vs Similar Hotels

Mixed/average — rooms are sometimes small with tiny bathrooms, limited view due to trees, few electrical outlets, poor lighting and weak soundproofing despite reports of cleanliness.

Some reviews noted issues with room quality, such as old and stiff beds.

Mixed: some rooms comfortable and well-sized, while others were described as old, small, worn, or with maintenance issues (peeling wallpaper, flickering lights, broken AC).

Mixed room quality: some stylish, comfortable rooms noted, but others did not match photos, were smaller, noisy or lacked modern finishes.

Mixed signals: several guests praised very clean rooms, but others reported a rather dirty pool and housekeeping items left around; overall cleanliness is inconsistent.

Some reviews mentioned mold in the bathroom and an old room.

Mixed reports: several guests praised cleanliness, but multiple strong complaints about smells (dog/cat), dust, and aging fixtures lowered the score.

Multiple reviews mention dirty walls and one report of a cockroach; cleanliness is a notable weakness in some rooms.

Excellent — many guests highlight the top location (2–3 minutes to the sea and old town), quiet street yet immediate access to bars, shops and restaurants.

Numerous mentions of the excellent location near the old town and sea.

Repeatedly described as excellent and in the heart of the old town; many guests highlighted the prime, convenient location.

Consistently praised across reviews — close to Old Town, restaurants and shops; architecture/setting also highlighted as a major positive.

Outstanding — staff repeatedly praised in multiple reviews (friendly, professional, helpful reception and managers, specific staff named for excellent service and organization).

Many reviews praised the friendly staff and attentiveness.

Consistently praised: staff described as very friendly, helpful, assisted with luggage and parking information; several mentions of excellent service.

Mixed reports: several comments praise helpful staff, but at least one guest experienced unhelpful, impatient front desk attitude that negatively affected their stay.

Excellent — breakfast repeatedly described as substantial, varied and healthy; dining staff noted as efficient and pleasant.

Breakfast received mixed reviews; some noted good variety and taste.

Split feedback: many guests enjoyed an extensive, attractive breakfast buffet, but there are notable complaints about poor/old or low-quality breakfast on some days.

Breakfast is frequently praised, but half‑board evening options are limited and repetitive; drinks (alcohol) considered expensive by some guests.

Basic but present — pool, tea/coffee in rooms and standard facilities; pool care praised by some but criticized by others, and limited power outlets/lighting affect perceived amenity quality.

Positive feedback for amenities like the gym, sauna, and pool area.

Pool and garden areas received strong positive remarks (clean, renovated, relaxing); overall grounds and common areas praised.

Good amenities such as pleasant pools and breakfasts are mentioned, though pools are described as small/crowded and Wi‑Fi coverage was weak in some rooms.

Generally good value for many guests due to excellent service, breakfast and well-priced excursions, though a few found the price high given small rooms or aging aspects.

The prices were mentioned as higher than expected in some areas.

Mixed perceptions: one guest felt the price did not match quality, while others did not raise value concerns; overall slightly above average.

Several guests explicitly call it excellent value for money; however alcohol prices and à-la-carte dinner limits in half-board are drawbacks.