The Originals City, Hôtel Rennes Sud vs Similar Hotels

Mixed quality: some rooms described as nice, but multiple complaints about cramped sleeping arrangements for families, old/worn bedding, broken fixtures, and rooms without air conditioning making them uncomfortable.

Rooms are generally described as comfortable, though some reports of noise issues.

Rooms are generally comfortable, although some issues were noted with noise and size.

Mixed room quality: many guests praise comfortable beds and adequate space for short stays, but there are recurring mentions of small rooms, stained curtains, dated bathrooms and poor sound insulation.

Several guests reported poor cleanliness: insect infestations (ants, cockroaches, large grasshopper), stains on sheets and general cleanliness issues in some rooms.

Several mentions of cleanliness appreciation, but also complaints about toilet cleanliness.

The hotel is described as clean, but some guests noted issues with maintenance, such as not having clean cups.

Frequently praised: multiple reviews explicitly mention 'propreté', 'chambre propre' and good housekeeping; a few comments note dated bathroom finishes but overall cleanliness is consistently positive.

Repeatedly praised across reviews as a very good/convenient location.

Location is praised for convenience and accessibility.

Several reviews mention the area as not ideal, with some environmental concerns.

Mixed location sentiment: some guests appreciate proximity to restaurants and convenience for a stopover, but several note the hotel is in an industrial area, far from the centre and sometimes perceived as noisy or poorly located.

Mostly positive reception comments (friendly, courteous staff, offered a fan on arrival); however there are isolated negative reports (ironic receptionist response about bedding, unresolved double-payment issue).

Service is highlighted as friendly and helpful by multiple reviewers.

The staff is reported to be welcoming and pleasant, contributing positively to the overall stay.

Mixed feedback: many reports of friendly, helpful staff (good check-in, welcoming reception, specific praise for staff like 'Ali'), but several complaints about an unfriendly night guardian, occasional rude personnel and one serious report of racist behaviour.

Breakfast received negative remarks (one review explicitly advises to avoid); limited positive mention of food/beverage offerings.

Breakfast received mixed reviews, with claims of it being incomplete at times.

The breakfast received positive remarks, indicating good quality for the offerings.

Generally very positive: breakfast repeatedly praised as varied, containing local products and enjoyable; also positive comments about available snacks/coffee in the hall.

Notable lack of amenities for some guests: no air conditioning in many rooms, no extra/rollaway beds available, broken blinds/lamps and limited in-room comforts.

Some amenities are appreciated, but lack of an elevator mentioned negatively.

Basic amenities are available, but some guests found the offerings limited.

Mixed amenities: breakfast offerings and lobby refreshments are appreciated, but there are frequent negative notes about lack of air conditioning during heatwaves, old hairdryers and limited in-room ventilation.

Mixed perceptions: several guests mention good value/quality-price ratio, while others feel it's overpriced given the issues; overall leans positive due to price comments.

Good value for comfort and services provided, especially breakfast.

Many guests feel the hotel offers decent value, especially with the price point considered.

Mixed value perception: some guests call the price excellent for quality, while others feel it is overpriced for an aging property (reports of unexpected price changes and high rates during events).