Tuvana Hotel vs Similar Hotels

Mixed: some rooms comfortable and well-sized, while others were described as old, small, worn, or with maintenance issues (peeling wallpaper, flickering lights, broken AC).

Some reviews noted the rooms were well-equipped, but also mentioned issues with the bed and aspects of maintenance.

Mixed room quality: some stylish, comfortable rooms noted, but others did not match photos, were smaller, noisy or lacked modern finishes.

Some reviews noted issues with room quality, such as old and stiff beds.

Mixed reports: several guests praised cleanliness, but multiple strong complaints about smells (dog/cat), dust, and aging fixtures lowered the score.

Mixed sentiments regarding cleanliness; one review mentioned issues with the room's smell and unupdated items.

Multiple reviews mention dirty walls and one report of a cockroach; cleanliness is a notable weakness in some rooms.

Some reviews mentioned mold in the bathroom and an old room.

Repeatedly described as excellent and in the heart of the old town; many guests highlighted the prime, convenient location.

Multiple reviews highlighted the hotel's advantageous position in the Old Town.

Consistently praised across reviews — close to Old Town, restaurants and shops; architecture/setting also highlighted as a major positive.

Numerous mentions of the excellent location near the old town and sea.

Consistently praised: staff described as very friendly, helpful, assisted with luggage and parking information; several mentions of excellent service.

Staff were frequently praised for being friendly and helpful.

Mixed reports: several comments praise helpful staff, but at least one guest experienced unhelpful, impatient front desk attitude that negatively affected their stay.

Many reviews praised the friendly staff and attentiveness.

Split feedback: many guests enjoyed an extensive, attractive breakfast buffet, but there are notable complaints about poor/old or low-quality breakfast on some days.

Breakfast was described as basic and could be improved based on multiple comments.

Breakfast is frequently praised, but half‑board evening options are limited and repetitive; drinks (alcohol) considered expensive by some guests.

Breakfast received mixed reviews; some noted good variety and taste.

Pool and garden areas received strong positive remarks (clean, renovated, relaxing); overall grounds and common areas praised.

Basic amenities were available, but some guests desired additional items like a kettle.

Good amenities such as pleasant pools and breakfasts are mentioned, though pools are described as small/crowded and Wi‑Fi coverage was weak in some rooms.

Positive feedback for amenities like the gym, sauna, and pool area.

Mixed perceptions: one guest felt the price did not match quality, while others did not raise value concerns; overall slightly above average.

Good value noted for the price considering location and quality.

Several guests explicitly call it excellent value for money; however alcohol prices and à-la-carte dinner limits in half-board are drawbacks.

The prices were mentioned as higher than expected in some areas.