Quality Hotel Manaus vs Similar Hotels

Rooms are mostly comfortable and spacious, though some reviews mention issues needing repair.

Rooms described as spacious and comfortable, but some complaints about maintenance issues.

Multiple guests describe rooms as spacious, comfortable and with great views; some note older construction and minor maintenance issues but overall room comfort is highlighted.

Many guests praised spacious, comfortable rooms, bedding and functioning air conditioning and hot water; some cited maintenance issues (bathroom flooding, nonfunctional bathroom bin, missing safety latch) which modestly reduce the score.

Overall cleanliness was noted positively, with mentions of clean rooms, though some cleaning issues were mentioned.

Some complaints regarding cleanliness, including dirty tables and old building conditions.

Mixed to negative mentions: reports of maintenance issues in bathrooms and at least one review reporting cockroaches; some reviews said showers/rooms were only just clean.

Mostly reported as clean in many reviews, but multiple guests noted small insects in bathrooms and one review reported 'sucio' and poor maintenance, lowering this score.

Location is consistently praised for being near amenities and attractions.

Many guests appreciated the hotel's great location near shopping and amenities.

Generally reported as central and convenient (close to shopping and central areas) by several guests, though a minority mentioned it felt not central/unsafe for tourists.

Frequently described as excellent and convenient for the Adrianópolis/center area with good views; one guest noted it is not close to airport or central core, but consensus is very positive.

Service was highlighted as friendly and professional, with numerous positive comments about staff.

Overall positive experiences with the service, though there were concerns about professional handling of overbooking.

Predominantly positive: many comments praise very friendly, helpful and professional staff (specific praise for reception staff), though there are a few isolated check-in/staff attitude complaints.

Generally praised (helpful staff like Igor, responsive reception/owner), though a few comments noted limited English proficiency and one unfriendly report; overall service is a strong point.

Food quality received praise, with many enjoying the breakfast variety.

Breakfast praised for quality and variety, though some concerns about food temperature.

Mixed: a few guests praised an excellent breakfast, but others found breakfast options limited, slow service for specific items and prices high (some specific complaints about cost).

Breakfast received frequent praise (varied breads, tapioca, 'first rate'), though a few guests complained about limited variety/quality relative to price.

Good amenities including pool, sauna, and gym, though some maintenance issues were noted.

Positive mentions of amenities like the pool and breakfast, with some room for improvement in equipment.

Some amenities problems noted: requests for smart TV unmet, noisy air conditioning/motor, missing toiletries/water/robes reported by guests — uneven amenities experience.

Strong rooftop amenities cited repeatedly (pool, bar, terrace, sauna) with great views and pleasant communal areas; occasional pool cleaning timing noted but overall amenities are a highlight.

Some concerns over the price in relation to the quality of accommodations.

Generally seen as good value, though some felt the pricing did not match the experience.

Clear negative sentiment: several guests called the hotel overpriced (expensive breakfast, drinks, and extras) and reported overcharging or poor value compared with expectations.

Numerous comments call it an excellent cost-benefit option and cheaper than central hotels while offering good quality, making value perception very high.