HOTEL CAMPO GRANDE vs Similar Hotels

Negative experiences with older rooms and additional costs mentioned.

Concerns regarding room conditions and amenities.

Rooms described as older with issues such as noise and maintenance.

Some positive remarks about spacious rooms, but noise issues and minor discomforts were mentioned.

Multiple mentions of cleanliness issues in rooms, impacting the score.

Mentioned issues with room cleanliness and maintenance.

Several reviews mentioned cleanliness issues, particularly with room status.

Some comments indicate cleanliness issues, such as the bathroom light and old bedding.

Consistently praised for its central and convenient location.

Location praised but noted issues with surrounding environment.

Location praised for convenience, though some noted noise issues.

Good reviews about the hotel's convenient location near the airport.

Generally positive sentiments about the staff being helpful and friendly.

Staff were generally described as friendly and accommodating.

Staff friendliness was frequently praised, contributing positively to the service score.

Multiple reviews praise the staff's cordiality and helpfulness.

Ended up being rated lower due to mentions of breakfast not meeting expectations.

Breakfast options received positive feedback, though not all aspects were endorsed.

Breakfast rated highly, with multiple mentions of quality.

Many guests remarked positively about the breakfast quality and variety.

Standard amenities; some dissatisfaction noted regarding pool cleanliness.

Limited amenities mentioned; negative points for missing items.

Amenities like the pool received mixed reviews; some enjoyed them, but others found them lacking.

The hotel is well-equipped, although some amenities had minor complaints.

Mixed sentiments about pricing and additional fees for room upgrades.

Considered good value overall despite issues.

General sentiments suggest good value given its location and service.

Good cost-benefit ratio as highlighted in reviews.