Hotel Elysian Residency vs Similar Hotels

Multiple complaints about small room size and small/slippery bathrooms; maintenance issues (shaky hand-shower holder) and some non-working appliances (refrigerator, tea maker).

Some guests enjoyed spacious rooms, but older interiors and issues with bathroom facilities were noted.

Some reviews indicated rooms were old and had issues with size and ventilation.

Several complaints about room size, old furnishings, and lack of necessary amenities.

Widely praised in multiple reviews: described as 'super clean', 'spotlessly clean' and 'clean and neatly organised'.

Guests mentioned the property was very clean, but some areas like carpets were noted as dirty and old.

Multiple complaints about dirty rooms, stained towels, and poor hygiene.

Multiple reviews indicate issues with cleanliness, including dirty carpets and slow service.

Consistently noted as very convenient and well connected — close to markets, bus stand and airport; good accessibility.

While some appreciated the location, many reviews mentioned that it was difficult to get in and out due to traffic and the area itself being quite noisy.

Frequent mentions of a great location near attractions.

Location was generally praised, though some reviews mentioned it could be better.

Mixed feedback: several mentions of friendly, helpful and 'brilliant' staff, but also reports of rude staff, slow reception replies, long waits at check-in and restrictive guest policies.

Some reviews indicate the staff was helpful, but there were also complaints about staff confusion during dining.

Staff received numerous compliments for being helpful and attentive.

Staff were often described as accommodating and attentive.

Breakfast is described as tasty with good variety by some, but others note early depletion of dishes, restrictions on takeaway and limited availability on certain days.

Food quality received mixed comments, with issues on freshness and a lack of certain items.

Food quality praised, but breakfast options were limited.

Food quality was frequently praised, along with the buffet options.

Generally well equipped (hair dryer, coffee maker, kettle, outlets compatible with Japanese plugs). Some isolated amenity failures (fridge, tea maker) but overall strong.

Basic amenities were present, but missing WiFi and issues with breakfast items detracted from the experience.

Facilities received mixed feedback, with some mentions of improvements needed.

Amenities mostly met expectations but some areas need improvement.

Several guests explicitly praise value ('Insane value for money', 'good for the value'), recommending it for family stays.

Mixed feedback; some feel charges were premium for an average property.

Value described as reasonable, but not exceptional.

Value perceived as fair, but some noted that certain rooms are overpriced.