
Compare similar hotels across guest insights, rooms, location, amenities, value, nearby attractions and suitability to understand the trade-offs before you choose.
Lodgegrid Decision Intelligence

Rooms
8.3Rooms are clean and comfortable, but some felt they were too large or lacked certain amenities.
Cleanliness
8.3Several reviews highlighted cleanliness as positive, but some mentioned issues in shared areas.
Service
9.3Staff was frequently described as helpful and friendly, indicating excellent service.




What you may gain by choosing another hotel.
Ullevål Hotel
7.7/10Saga Apartments Oslo
8.6/10Cochs Pensjonat
8.2/10Bunks at Rode
8.6/10Ullevål Hotel
8.0Rooms generally clean but had issues like falling shower heads.
Saga Apartments Oslo
8.3Reviews indicated mixed feelings about room quality due to furniture layout and noise issues.
Cochs Pensjonat
8.0Rooms are described as basic but acceptable, indicating a mid-level quality.
Bunks at Rode
8.3Rooms are clean and comfortable, but some felt they were too large or lacked certain amenities.
Ullevål Hotel
7.5Mixed feedback on cleanliness; mentioned odors in bathrooms.
Saga Apartments Oslo
7.9Some guests mentioned cleanliness issues including stains on towels and dirty floors.
Cochs Pensjonat
8.0Some comments mentioned cleanliness and order, indicating that it is generally good but could have slight improvements.
Bunks at Rode
8.3Several reviews highlighted cleanliness as positive, but some mentioned issues in shared areas.
Ullevål Hotel
8.4Conveniently located near hospitals, though not ideal for tourists.
Saga Apartments Oslo
9.4Many guests noted the excellent location and proximity to key attractions.
Cochs Pensjonat
9.0The location was frequently highlighted as central and convenient, contributing positively to the overall experience.
Bunks at Rode
8.8Location is generally convenient, with close access to supermarkets and public transport.
Ullevål Hotel
8.9Positive remarks about friendly and accommodating staff.
Saga Apartments Oslo
9.3Guests appreciated the welcoming hosts and attentive reception service.
Cochs Pensjonat
9.0Many reviews praised the staff for being friendly and helpful, indicating a high level of service.
Bunks at Rode
9.3Staff was frequently described as helpful and friendly, indicating excellent service.
Ullevål Hotel
—Saga Apartments Oslo
—Cochs Pensjonat
—Bunks at Rode
—Ullevål Hotel
6.5Breakfast quality criticized as poor and not worth the cost.
Saga Apartments Oslo
8.9Some guests enjoyed the option to eat at the hotel, despite some kitchen limitations.
Cochs Pensjonat
7.0Many guests missed breakfast options, which impacted the scoring for food and beverage.
Bunks at Rode
7.8No breakfast service mentioned, which may affect the overall food experience.
Ullevål Hotel
7.5Lacked basic amenities like kettles and good breakfast options.
Saga Apartments Oslo
7.3Guests were disappointed by the lack of basic kitchen utensils and some mentioned missing appliances.
Cochs Pensjonat
7.5Some amenities were mentioned, but there are limitations like missing kitchen items, which impacted the score.
Bunks at Rode
8.3Basic kitchen amenities mentioned, but several reviews noted lack of cooking facilities.
Ullevål Hotel
7.0Price does not reflect the quality; seen as too high for offerings.
Saga Apartments Oslo
8.8Overall, guests felt the price was fair given the location, but highlighted some shortcomings.
Cochs Pensjonat
8.5Positive sentiments about receiving a good deal for the price were noted, reflecting good value.
Bunks at Rode
9.3Many guests mentioned that the accommodation provided good value for the price paid.
Ullevål Hotel
Ulevål sykehusSaga Apartments Oslo
Dronning Astrids parkCochs Pensjonat
Mot LysetBunks at Rode
Kirsten Hansteens plass