ゲストハウス EZO Run Sapporo 札幌中心部でシンプルな滞在ができるホステル vs Similar Hotels

Overall comfort is good, although some beds report issues with air drafts.

Rooms described as comfortable, though there were complaints about shared facilities affecting privacy.

Rooms described as small but comfortable with comfy beds and adequate facilities in many cases; some negatives (cold at night, limited space) keep this slightly above average.

Room size was mentioned negatively in some reviews.

There were cleanliness concerns mentioned due to bedbug incidents.

Cleanliness mentioned as an issue with some reviews stating the washrooms were dirty and issues with shared spaces.

Multiple reviews mention unclean rooms, dust under beds, smelly bedding and insufficient room cleaning; cleanliness is below average as reported by several guests.

Some reviews mentioned cleanliness issues with the bathroom amenities.

Location is very convenient, close to shopping and markets.

Location praised for being convenient and close to attractions, with many positive reviews about its accessibility.

Consistently noted as very convenient (near Susukino, Nijo Market, city centre and transport); location is a clear strength.

Many reviews highlighted the convenient location near amenities.

Check-in was easy and staff responded quickly to problems.

Multiple reviews highlighted the staff's politeness and good service.

Numerous comments praise staff as very friendly, helpful and accommodating (helped with luggage, switched rooms to female-only when possible); service is a strong positive.

Multiple positive comments about friendly and polite staff.

Limited food service, mainly self-catering options.

Some reviews noted food availability issues, with breakfast sometimes not being satisfactory.

Bar/restaurant repeatedly praised as cosy with good food and friendly patrons, though a few noted limited beverage options (no tea); generally a positive aspect.

Guests praised the breakfast quality and variety.

Shared spaces are available with some kitchen appliances.

Facilities such as public baths and sauna are appreciated, but some wished for improvements or additions.

Several guests mention missing amenities (no fridge in rooms, limited toiletries, no working elevator in annex) and lack of tea/drinks; amenities are somewhat limited.

General satisfaction with available amenities; however, some concerns about parking.

Very affordable for what is provided.

Value for money indicated as good with many reviews emphasizing the reasonable pricing relative to other areas.

Frequent notes about good/cheap pricing and ‘really good price’ sentiment, though one guest felt it was not enough for the price; overall perceived as good value.

Guests felt that the pricing was reasonable for the quality provided.