Leilighet midt i Oslo sentrum 2 soverom og stue vs Similar Hotels

Spacious apartment contributing to a positive room quality experience.

Mixed feedback on room quality; some found it spacious while others reported unpleasant smells.

Mixed sentiments about room quality; issues like noisy areas, thin walls, and uncomfortable seating affected the perception.

Rooms are spacious and include kitchen appliances but are described as old, with hard beds and sometimes poor temperature control (no AC) — functional but dated.

Mentioned issues with amenities like kettle not being usable indicate a need for improvement in cleanliness and maintenance.

Several reviews highlighted issues with cleanliness, such as dirty rooms and unpleasant odors.

Various reviews mentioned cleanliness positively, but some highlighted a lack of amenities like soap and residual items from previous tenants.

Multiple reviews mention unclean bathrooms, hairs and strange stains, insects on the bathroom floor despite clean bed linen in some rooms — overall cleanliness is below standard.

Location praised as ideal and very close to the city center, making it very favorable.

Multiple reviews praised the great location, near bars, restaurants, and major attractions.

Consistently praised for its central location and accessibility to transit and attractions.

Consistently praised: very close to the metro, parks, supermarkets and bakery; convenient access to the city centre and local amenities.

Overall positive sentiment despite a slight communication issue with the owner before arrival.

Overall supportive staff, though there were some complaints about the response to maintenance issues.

Great customer service noted in several reviews, especially with friendly staff and responsive issue resolution.

Service is inconsistent: several guests report no on-site reception and phone-based remote handling (impersonal, sometimes rude), while a few note helpful staff who assisted with luggage.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Positive mentions about local cafe but limited comments on broader food options.

Not specifically mentioned but implied pleasant in terms of self-catering options.

No consistent on-site F&B service mentioned; nearby bakeries/shops available — default rating applied where category is not discussed in reviews.

Some amenities need maintenance, but the spaciousness is a plus.

Inconsistencies in kitchen and bathroom amenities were noted, such as lack of utensils and poor cleanliness.

Some amenities were noted as lacking (e.g., insufficient kitchen utensils, no soap), impacting the overall rating.

Good basic amenities such as kitchen, washer and parking availability in principle; however guests note missing small supplies (toiletries, cleaning tools), parking condition issues and occasional unclean utensils.

Fair value considering location and spaciousness.

Generally perceived as good value given the central location despite some issues.

Generally viewed as a good deal for the price, despite some concerns about quality.

Several guests explicitly mention the property being good value for money and reasonably priced for city access; despite some extra fees/deposit complaints, overall perceived as strong value.