Mooj served Apartments vs Similar Hotels

Some reports of maintenance issues, but overall satisfaction with space.

Mentioned issues with room maintenance and old furnishings, but generally appreciation for size and cleanliness.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Mixed feedback: comfortable beds and quiet rooms reported, but several guests complained about small/narrow rooms, mismatches between booked and assigned rooms, AC blowing onto the bed and lack of slippers.

Multiple reviews mentioned issues with cleanliness and odors.

Multiple mentions of cleanliness, with some negative feedback about room cleanliness and maintenance issues.

The bathroom is small and old.

Frequent praise for cleanliness (many 'نظيف' / 'نظافة' comments) and reports of provided cleaning supplies; one or two mentions listing cleanliness as a con but overall strongly positive.

Mixed reviews due to its location in an industrial area.

Frequent praise for the location, cited as ideal and convenient for services.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Multiple comments note an excellent, central location near shopping and convenience for business; a few mentions of narrow street/ongoing repairs affecting access.

Positive sentiments regarding the service staff and responsiveness.

Positive feedback on reception and staff service, although some mentions of subpar service were noted.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Staff and reception repeatedly described as friendly, helpful and professional (explicit thanks to reception staff and mentions of specific employees); service is a clear strength in reviews.

No specific mentions, assumed standard quality.

Repeated mentions of inadequate breakfast options impacting overall dining experience.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Few comments overall; some guests noted missing breakfast or limited F&B, one mention of food positively—overall slightly below the hotel average due to missing/limited breakfast reports.

Amenities mentioned positively apart from water quality.

Not much negative feedback, but some guests wanted more options for amenities.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Notable issues with parking availability/crowding and weak internet on some floors; some positive notes about basic toiletries and towels but laundry service damage reported—amenities are inconsistent.

Favorable pricing for the quality received.

Overall positive comments regarding the cost-value proposition, though some found it lacking compared to needs.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Multiple guests note good/excellent value (e.g., 'Pay less get more' and explicit value-for-money mentions), making this an overall positive aspect.