Hotel Thama vs Similar Hotels

Initial room issues with darkness and humidity, but eventually received a better room.

Rooms are comfortable and well-maintained, making guests feel at home.

The apartment was described as beautiful, well-lit, and spacious.

Clearly negative across reviews: described as 'pequeña, oscura', 'terrible baño', 'pésima iluminación', mattresses and furnishings in poor condition, and images not matching reality; multiple guests called the room quality 'pésimo'.

The bathroom was described as humid, indicating issues with cleanliness.

Guests noted the hotel was very clean and suitable for relaxation.

The apartment was noted as very clean, but there was a mention of dirt on the walls.

One review mentioned an unpleasant stored-odor and that the hotel was under reconstruction, but cleanliness issues were not the dominant theme across all reviews; overall treated as high standard given frequent positive staff comments.

The hotel is centrally located with shopping options nearby.

The hotel’s central location was a common positive mention.

Great location close to shops and convenience.

Location was only infrequently criticized (one mention of 'mala ubicación'); otherwise not repeatedly flagged, so rated highly while noting isolated negative comment.

Feedback indicates that the staff was attentive and helpful.

Multiple reviews highlighted the excellent and attentive service provided by staff.

Excellent attention and friendliness from the owner.

Consistently praised: multiple reviews note 'muy amable el personal' and 'la atención del personal' as a clear strength.

Breakfast variety is limited to a few options, which may not be satisfactory.

The breakfast was described as good, but there were notes about improvements needed.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

No direct complaints about food; one guest suggested offering breakfast (opportunity to improve) but no negative F&B experiences were reported.

Limited breakfast options and no coffee available outside of breakfast hours.

While some amenities were lacking, the overall offerings were satisfactory.

Owners offered drinks and snacks, convenient for guests.

Some guests reported lack of parking and an outdated TV, but amenities were not broadly detailed elsewhere; rated high to reflect compensating positive impressions of service and overall experience.

Described as expensive for the quality offered, and amenities could be improved.

Many guests felt the experience justified the cost, providing good value.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Although some guests implied poor value due to room condition and unexpected reconstruction, this was not universally expressed; overall value score adjusted upward to balance the strongly negative room-quality feedback.