Toppleilighet Dr Holms vs Similar Hotels

The apartment was described as cozy and home-like.

Rooms described as spacious, well-equipped and some with terraces, but reports also mention worn beds causing back pain and some rooms feeling outdated or awkwardly arranged.

Rooms were spacious but some had issues with amenities and furnishings.

Rooms are nice but issues with amenities.

The cleanliness was mentioned to be subpar with issues around surface cleaning.

Multiple guests reported poor housekeeping: rooms not cleaned during multi-night stays, no fresh towels, found food remnants and hair in bed/bathroom; pool was reported dirty by at least one reviewer.

Some reviews mention cleanliness, but others noted dirty chairs and unwashed bed linen.

Complaints about unclean fridge leftover from previous guests.

The location was described as central, quiet and peaceful.

Location is often praised as excellent for Rallarvegen, skiing and general sightseeing; noted as a strong asset though quieter in summer and somewhat remote for non-winter visits.

Location is praised for its views and proximity to various amenities.

Centrally located and good for access.

Good communication from the landlord and standard service expected for this hotel tier.

Service is mixed but generally positive: several guests praised friendly, helpful reception staff (room upgrades, restaurant bookings), while others reported staffing shortages, unkept reservation promises and unprofessional handling.

Staff were mentioned as friendly and attentive, positive comments about service quality.

Staff was lacking and complaints about unacceptable delays.

Some concerns were mentioned regarding the restaurant's main course.

Breakfast and F&B receive frequent praise—described as abundant, high quality and a highlight for many guests—though a few complained about buffet chaos and weak standard coffee.

Breakfast was mentioned as a downside since it wasn't included.

Good breakfast and tasty food but missed options.

Amenities were sufficient and adequately met the guests' needs.

Amenities are good overall (pool, sauna included for some stays, historic public spaces), but guests reported the jacuzzi often closed/cold, a sometimes dirty pool, and limited elevator access in the building.

Lacked some expected amenities like bedding and towels, but kitchen was well-equipped.

Limited breakfast options and missing kettle.

Value reflected the overall experience although some aspects were noted as dated.

Mixed perceptions: some guests find the price justified by charm and services, while others felt the hotel was expensive given issues with cleaning, amenities or service lapses.

Many feel the pricing is appropriate for the size and quality of the accommodation.

Expectations not met for the price.