Cosy Europarlament apartment vs Similar Hotels

Most guests found the rooms spacious and comfortable, though some mentioned minor issues.

Mixed: rooms described as basic, small and cosy but practical; criticisms include small size, uncomfortable beds for some, old furnishings and noisy rooms in places (thin floors/walls).

Rooms were spacious and comfortable, with positive mentions regarding bed comfort and cleanliness.

Rooms mentioned as spacious and comfortable, though some noted noise issues.

Some concerns about cleanliness were noted, such as issues with the linens and odors in common areas.

Generally praised for clean rooms by multiple guests, but a few reports mention old/ripped towels, a feeling of some areas not fully clean and inconsistent housekeeping (e.g., missed room cleaning, noisy early corridor cleaning).

Rooms cleaned to an exceptionally good standard, but minor concerns about room upkeep.

Multiple reviews noted issues with cleanliness, including dust and dirty furniture.

Multiple reviews highlighted the excellent proximity to the European Parliament and convenience to public transport.

Very strong: multiple comments calling the location fantastic/ideal, very close to metro/tram and within walking distance of restaurants and cafes; central for visits to Brussels.

Great location near public transport, making it easy to explore the city.

Many reviews highlighted excellent location, proximity to public transport and amenities.

Guests praised the host's attentiveness and helpfulness throughout their stay.

Consistently praised: many reviews highlight very friendly, helpful and welcoming staff and recommend the hotel largely because of the reception/team's assistance.

Staff were helpful, pleasant, and professional; several mentions of excellent service.

While there were some negative remarks, the overall sentiment was positive.

Not specifically mentioned in reviews, assumed standard for this tier.

Breakfast received positive mentions (varied and good quality for several guests); not a frequent focus in most reviews but where mentioned it was satisfactory.

Breakfast quality did not meet 4-star expectations; issues with cooked items noted.

Reviewers had mixed feelings about breakfast quality, mentioned as industrial.

Reviews indicate necessary amenities were provided, though some appliances were lacking.

Some shortcomings noted: lack of air conditioning in many rooms (fans used), occasional issues with AC control, slow/unstable Wi‑Fi; positives include vintage decor and a pleasant common area/garden.

Amenities were satisfactory, though some guests felt the breakfast and dining options were lacking.

Amenities generally received positive feedback, such as room facilities.

Many guests felt they received good value given the location and facilities offered.

Generally seen as good value by several guests (explicitly called exceptional value), though a minority felt it was not worth the price; overall perception leans positive due to location and service.

Not all offerings justified the cost, particularly regarding food options.

Value mentioned positively, with references to affordable parking and breakfast.