
Compare similar hotels across guest insights, rooms, location, amenities, value, nearby attractions and suitability to understand the trade-offs before you choose.
Lodgegrid Decision Intelligence

Rooms
8.3Reviews indicated mixed feelings about room quality due to furniture layout and noise issues.
Cleanliness
7.9Some guests mentioned cleanliness issues including stains on towels and dirty floors.
Location
9.4Many guests noted the excellent location and proximity to key attractions.
No close alternative was identified for this preference.




What you may gain by choosing another hotel.
Cochs Pensjonat
8.2/10Saga Apartments Oslo
8.6/10Scandic St. Olavs Plass
8.1/10Karl Johans gate 35
8.1/10Cochs Pensjonat
8.0Rooms are described as basic but acceptable, indicating a mid-level quality.
Saga Apartments Oslo
8.3Reviews indicated mixed feelings about room quality due to furniture layout and noise issues.
Scandic St. Olavs Plass
7.5Room was too small with no windows, leading to a warm environment.
Karl Johans gate 35
7.7Generally well-received; however, some mention of older bathrooms and noise issues.
Cochs Pensjonat
8.0Some comments mentioned cleanliness and order, indicating that it is generally good but could have slight improvements.
Saga Apartments Oslo
7.9Some guests mentioned cleanliness issues including stains on towels and dirty floors.
Scandic St. Olavs Plass
8.0Rooms were kept clean but decor felt a bit worn around the edges.
Karl Johans gate 35
7.2Several mentions of cleanliness issues, including trash found in the bathroom bins.
Cochs Pensjonat
9.0The location was frequently highlighted as central and convenient, contributing positively to the overall experience.
Saga Apartments Oslo
9.4Many guests noted the excellent location and proximity to key attractions.
Scandic St. Olavs Plass
9.1Great central location, ideal for exploring Oslo.
Karl Johans gate 35
8.8Conveniently located near main attractions and transportation, highlighted as a major pro.
Cochs Pensjonat
9.0Many reviews praised the staff for being friendly and helpful, indicating a high level of service.
Saga Apartments Oslo
9.3Guests appreciated the welcoming hosts and attentive reception service.
Scandic St. Olavs Plass
8.5Check-in was fast and efficient, with friendly service overall.
Karl Johans gate 35
8.7Positive mentions of friendly and helpful staff throughout multiple reviews.
Cochs Pensjonat
—Saga Apartments Oslo
—Scandic St. Olavs Plass
—Karl Johans gate 35
—Cochs Pensjonat
7.0Many guests missed breakfast options, which impacted the scoring for food and beverage.
Saga Apartments Oslo
8.9Some guests enjoyed the option to eat at the hotel, despite some kitchen limitations.
Scandic St. Olavs Plass
7.0Lunch was chaotic with limited options; breakfast was better but still crowded.
Karl Johans gate 35
8.7Breakfast options were consistently praised, considered a highlight of the stay.
Cochs Pensjonat
7.5Some amenities were mentioned, but there are limitations like missing kitchen items, which impacted the score.
Saga Apartments Oslo
7.3Guests were disappointed by the lack of basic kitchen utensils and some mentioned missing appliances.
Scandic St. Olavs Plass
8.5Standard amenities provided, suitable for functional stays.
Karl Johans gate 35
8.2Good range of amenities including breakfast, though specific offerings were not detailed.
Cochs Pensjonat
8.5Positive sentiments about receiving a good deal for the price were noted, reflecting good value.
Saga Apartments Oslo
8.8Overall, guests felt the price was fair given the location, but highlighted some shortcomings.
Scandic St. Olavs Plass
8.0Offers decent pricing but lacks some quality in certain areas.
Karl Johans gate 35
7.7Generally viewed as a good value, especially compared to other hotels in Oslo.
Cochs Pensjonat
Mot LysetSaga Apartments Oslo
Dronning Astrids parkScandic St. Olavs Plass
St. Olavs plassKarl Johans gate 35
Johan Sverdrup