Dwella Suvarnabhumi vs Similar Hotels

Rooms described as old/antiquated, worn fixtures, broken tiles and outdated bathrooms; some comfortable beds noted but overall in need of renovation.

Spacious and comfortable rooms were highlighted.

Rooms described as old, not as pictured, with broken furniture, door gaps letting insects in, noisy and with malfunctioning AC and occasional lock/elevator issues.

Mixed experiences; some found the bed uncomfortable and the bathroom lacking. However, some stated rooms were spacious.

Frequent reports of mould, cockroaches, dirty tiles, bad odour and general lack of cleanliness; several guests described rooms as 'disgusting' or in need of deep cleaning.

The room cleanliness was lacking as per some reviews.

Multiple reviews report serious cleanliness issues: red ants in bathroom, filthy ashtray, moldy/cakey air-con, sewage smell and general dirtiness.

The room had a strong smell of cigarette smoke and the bathroom smelled of mold. Cleanliness and maintenance were far below acceptable standards.

Very close to the international airport (positive for transit guests) but repeatedly described as in an industrial/unsafe area, distant from restaurants, with narrow or poor access roads — mixed but airport proximity is a clear plus.

Well-located for airport access, though some found it isolated.

Consistently noted as close to the airport, near shops and a hospital — convenient for transit, though some mention main-road noise.

Convenient location for the airport, with easy access by taxi.

Mostly praised: many guests described staff as friendly, humble and helpful with airport transfers; a few reports of indifferent or rude behaviour but the majority comments were positive, justifying a strong service score.

Staff were mentioned as friendly and helpful.

Staff described as apologetic, friendly and helpful; reception tried to resolve problems and offered refunds/transfers and free airport shuttle in several reports.

Some reviews mention helpful staff, but there were complaints about poor service at the reception.

Mixed but generally acceptable: some guests praised the restaurant, others noted breakfast format could improve; overall decent for an airport hotel.

Breakfast options were considered limited and could be improved.

Breakfast received positive mention in at least one review; no other consistent F&B offerings discussed.

No specific mentions about food, but nearby food stalls available.

Has an airport shuttle (sometimes charged), small pool, on-site restaurant; lacks a gym and several guests noted tiny or insignificant lobby/pool — adequate for short stays but limited amenities.

The pool area received positive comments, enhancing the overall stay.

Breakfast praised in one review and airport shuttle available; otherwise limited or basic amenities reported (no strong positives beyond shuttle/breakfast).

Basic amenities with no strong positives or negatives highlighted.

Frequently described as cheap and a sensible option for an overnight stay near the airport; good value for short transit stays despite shortcomings.

Guests felt they received a good value for the price paid.

Mixed — marketed as budget/transit option (near airport, low price) but poor cleanliness/room condition reduced perceived value for several guests.

A good price for proximity to the airport and comfort for short stays.