Ucayali Hotel vs Similar Hotels

Generally positive; guests appreciated the spacious and clean rooms.

Reviewers mentioned old beds, uncomfortable sleeping conditions and poorly maintained rooms.

Most reviews mention the comfort and quality of the accommodations.

Mixed: complaints about small rooms, very soft mattresses, ventilation and maintenance issues (bathroom, shower), while some guests found rooms comfortable and adequately sized.

Mixed feedback; some praised cleanliness, but others noted issues, like the dirty bathrooms.

Multiple reviews highlighted cleanliness issues, with mentions of dirty rooms and bathrooms.

Some mentions of cleanliness issues, though generally positive.

Mixed to negative: multiple reports of very dirty rooms (hair, stained sheets, mold) though a few guests explicitly praised cleanliness.

Frequently mentioned positively, with good remarks about the scenery and amenities.

Consistently noted as a strong point in reviews; guests appreciated the location.

Frequent mentions of good and convenient location.

Very strong: numerous reviews highlight excellent/very good location as a key pro.

Consistently praised as excellent, with multiple reviews highlighting the helpfulness of staff.

Service was rated poorly in some instances, but there were mentions of decent service at breakfast.

Multiple reviews highlight excellent service and attentiveness.

Consistently praised: reception and staff described as friendly, helpful and attentive; isolated issues (e.g., a cancelled booking) noted but service overall very positive.

Some positive comments, but noted that breakfast could have more options.

Breakfast was generally praised, but some items were noted as stale.

Some mentions of food options within the facilities.

Mixed: a few guests praise breakfast quality, while others report very poor breakfast experiences.

Well-received, with good mentions of the pool, gym, and overall facility quality.

Comments about breakfast variety were positive but other amenities faced criticism.

Reviews cite several provided amenities, though some were missing.

Moderately positive: facilities and kitchen staff received praise, but there are recurring problems (broken elevator, limited toiletries, no bidet/ducha higiênica, poor Wi‑Fi in some rooms).

Overall good value perceived, though some expressed desire for more variety in offerings.

Competitive pricing noted, though some felt it did not match the quality experienced.

Overall good value as indicated by many reviews.

Mixed perception: some call the stay reasonable for the price; negative points like expensive bottled water and poor breakfast reduce perceived value.