24 by AvenidA - Mountain Residence vs Similar Hotels

Rooms have great views and balconies but some guests reported small spaces and lack of air conditioning in certain units.

Rooms are generally spacious and well-equipped, with a few exceptions noted.

The rooms were noted as clean and well-furnished; however, some issues persisted with room amenities and TV function.

Spacious and comfortable rooms highlighted in several reviews.

Generally praised for very good cleanliness in rooms and common areas, though some guests noted issues with cleaning service availability and a complaint about deposit/return process.

Some comments indicate cleanliness issues, particularly with shared laundry facilities and worn-out furniture.

The cleanliness received mixed feedback, with specific mentions of cleanliness issues in the kitchen and a negative experience regarding the bathroom charges.

Reviews mentioned the standard of cleanliness and noted it was very clean.

Consistently highlighted as exceptional: central location, river views, close to center and shops, highly valued by guests.

Many reviews praise the convenient and attractive location, close to amenities.

The location was highly praised, being close to the bus stop and central attractions.

Multiple reviews praised the excellent location near amenities and ski lifts.

Staff repeatedly described as friendly, helpful and efficient (mentions of welcoming reception staff and specific praise for employees); fast check-in noted despite separate reception building.

Staff are consistently described as friendly and helpful.

While the service had a disappointing incident regarding the reception and compensation, the overall sentiment was that staff were friendly and service was standard for the hotel tier.

Friendly staff mentioned in several reviews, contributing to high service sentiment.

On-site Indian restaurant present and convenient, though one comment criticized its operations (claim about using hotel washers); otherwise few detailed F&B reviews.

Breakfast quality was noted positively, though limited in variety.

While there were limited food options readily available due to service issues, the sentiment remains neutral regarding quality.

Breakfast quality and offerings were generally praised.

Good on amenities: equipped kitchens, bidet (شطاف) in bathrooms, laundry/drying area and irons, parking available; some operational issues reported with external use of hotel laundry by restaurant.

Amenities are good but some guests desired more options such as bathroom partitions.

Amenities were criticized, especially concerning missing items in the kitchen and issues with spa facilities.

Basic amenities provided, but some reviews mentioned little to no kitchen utensils.

Multiple guests described the hotel as expensive/too pricey, indicating perception of lower value-for-money despite strong location and amenities.

Overall value is perceived as good given the offerings and location.

Perceived value for money was negatively impacted by unexpected charges during checkout.

Many guests felt that the price was fair for the quality and services offered.