Marques Best Apartments | Lisbon Best Apartments vs Similar Hotels

Spacious and modern apartments with good facilities and comfortable beds.

Several negative remarks: old or broken furniture (broken cupboard door), dated kitchen, poor lighting, noisy parquet and hard mattresses; a few guests did note modern/up-to-date apartments.

Mixed reviews on comfort and maintenance; some rooms were spacious while others had complaints.

Spacious rooms with good amenities, soundproofing could be improved.

The apartments were noted as very clean and spotless, meeting high standards.

Mixed feedback: many guests reported the apartments as clean, but several noted worn/dirty coverings, old kitchen fixtures and specific cleanliness issues (e.g., room 105) that lowered impressions.

Multiple mentions of cleanliness issues, including dirty rooms and varied comments on maintenance.

Impeccable cleanliness as noted in multiple reviews.

Conveniently located near public transport and central areas. A strong point.

Consistently praised as an excellent/very good location by many guests; a minority noted it can be a long walk (~1 hour) to the city centre.

Several reviews note good proximity to attractions but also some negatives about surrounding areas.

Great location, close to public transport and attractions.

Exceptional service from hosts, like Fernando, with quick responses and helpfulness.

Generally positive: staff described as pleasant and responsive (quick email replies) with daily cleaning service; some friction due to a slow/buggy online check-in process and ID upload requirements.

Consistently positive remarks about staff friendliness and helpfulness.

Employees are very friendly and professional, always available.

Some reviews mentioned availability of coffee and tea but limited food options nearby.

Positive: breakfast described several times as very good / delicious and a buffet option was appreciated.

Comments on breakfast variety being poor and several mentions of dissatisfaction with food options.

Breakfast options were good but could be more varied.

Well-equipped apartments with necessary amenities for a comfortable stay.

Well equipped: guests mention washer, dishwasher, microwave and sufficient cooking utensils; parking available (paid) and luggage lockers exist but may incur extra fees.

Some facilities require maintenance, impacting the perceived quality.

Basic breakfast and some amenities lack variety.

High quality of service and accommodation justifies the pricing.

Mixed perception: good value for location and cleanliness for some visitors, but extra charges (parking, lockers), dated furnishings and occasional quality issues reduce perceived value for others.

Overall perception of good value, though some reviews mention issues with room condition.

Overall good value considering location and service.