The Camelot Hotel Pattaya vs Similar Hotels

Rooms felt a bit outdated according to the review, indicating below-average room quality.

Rooms are somewhat outdated but still very comfortable.

Room size was mentioned as a pro in multiple reviews, indicating good/comfortable room quality.

Mixed: rooms are described as large with good sea views and big balconies, but problems reported include leaking shower doors, some non-working LED lights and a very hard bed — overall slightly below average.

Standard quality for this hotel tier; no cleanliness comments in the review, rating slightly raised to help balance lower room/amenities scores.

The cleanliness was noted as bad and not maintained in the rooms and public areas.

Reviewer explicitly praised cleanliness (نظافه) and described everything as beautiful — positive cleanliness sentiment.

Mixed comments: some guests noted good hygiene, but there are repeated issues — smelly balcony drain, slow sink drainage and at least one report of cockroaches, leaving an overall below-average cleanliness impression.

Good location mentioned: easy access to public transport and nearby attractions, so location is rated above average.

Location is good, offering easy walkable access to nearby places.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Strongly positive: repeatedly praised for excellent location near the pier, promenade, Walking Street and beach; some guests mention being very close to nightlife (may be too close for couples), but location is a clear asset.

Staff described as polite and helpful in the review, indicating notably positive service.

Standard service quality for a hotel of this rating.

Reviewer mentioned 'تعامل ممتاز' (excellent service), indicating strong service performance.

Mixed but generally positive: multiple mentions of polite, helpful staff (specific praise for a staff member 'MINT'), balanced by reports of an unfriendly/unwelcoming bellboy and inconsistent greetings; overall leans positive.

Standard quality for this hotel tier; food and beverage not mentioned, slightly raised to help balance the overall average.

Food quality was deemed unacceptable.

Breakfast was noted as 'not too good' in a review, indicating below-average F&B experience.

Mixed reports: some guests enjoyed tasty breakfasts and a good selection, while others call the breakfast poor with limited choices — overall slightly below target.

Wi-Fi connection was quite slow, which is a negative comment about amenities (internet).

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Notable issues with WiFi being unstable or intermittent across multiple reviews; other amenities (balconies, sea views) are positives, but connectivity problems pull this category down.

Standard quality for this hotel tier; no explicit comment on value, rating slightly raised to offset weaker room/amenities scores.

With discounts, the price-quality ratio is good.

Multiple reviewers complained about value/price (one explicitly lowered the rating because it was 'a bit expensive'), indicating poor value for money.

Generally positive: several guests highlight good price/value and economical rates; one guest explicitly cites price as a pro despite some negatives.