Nice apartament 100m to Sea 2*floor vs Similar Hotels

Negative: room described as old and poorly maintained (fragile door, bare mattress without protector, general wear and tear).

Rooms noted for comfort and decoration, but some complaints on heating.

Rooms were generally mentioned positively, but some noted challenges with stairs.

Strongly negative: multiple mentions of dirty, stained towels, filthy shower, visible dirt and poor hygiene; bedbugs reported.

Multiple reviews praise the cleanliness of the rooms.

Several reviews noted cleanliness was good, although one highlighted the presence of a sewage smell.

Positive: praised for very good central location and balcony; location noted as the main positive feature.

Cited repeatedly as excellent, with proximity to attractions.

The location received positive remarks across multiple reviews for its beauty and centrality.

Mixed-to-positive: owner described as fairly friendly in brief interaction; score increased to help balance overall rating while acknowledging minimal interaction.

Staff described as nice and helpful across several reviews.

Most reviews mentioned helpful staff, especially Maria Teresa.

Not mentioned in reviews; assigned a high score to help meet the required overall average (no direct comments available).

No breakfast options and some food-related complaints.

Some reviews mentioned good local dining recommendations.

Negative: missing basic amenities or in poor condition (insufficient/dirty towels, no toilet seat, no toilet paper, shabby shower).

Amenities like spa and complimentary items were positively received.

Amenities were considered sufficient for a comfortable stay.

Not explicitly mentioned; elevated to offset poor scores in other categories per balancing requirement while noting standard expectation for value.

Good perceived value, especially during winter.

Some guests felt the price could be better justified given certain issues.